[1. CALL TO ORDER & INVOCATION]
          [00:00:08]
          CALL TO ORDER THE BOARD OF MAYOR AND ALDERMEN MEETING FOR MONDAY, JULY 13TH TO ORDER. AND WE HAVE DOCTOR EDDIE THOMPSON HERE TO LEAD US WITH THE INVOCATION. AND IF ALDERMAN HALL, IF YOU'LL LEAD US IN THE PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE, PLEASE, PLEASE RISE. MAYOR, AGAIN, THANK YOU SO MUCH FOR THE OPPORTUNITY. THANK YOU. FATHER, WE COME TO YOU TODAY SEEKING YOUR WISDOM AND SEEKING YOUR DIRECTION FOR BUSINESS OF OUR CITY. LORD, WE THANK YOU FOR OUR ELECTED OFFICIALS. WE THANK YOU FOR OUR OUR TOWN, OUR CITY, ALL THOSE THAT TODAY LORD, JUST GAVE OF THEMSELVES AND WORK FOR COLLIERVILLE. LORD, WE THANK YOU FOR OUR MAYOR, OUR BOARD OF ALDERMEN. FATHER, WE THANK YOU FOR OUR DIRECTORS AND MANY THAT LORD THAT THAT WE NEVER SEE, BUT WE KNOW WORK FAITHFULLY FOR FOR THE CITY OF CAIRO. WE THANK YOU FOR THEM, BLESS THEM, STRENGTHEN THEM. WE PRAY FOR OUR FIRST RESPONDERS TODAY, AS ALWAYS AND EVERYONE, AGAIN, THAT IS INVOLVED IN MAKING COLLIERVILLE THE GREAT PLACE THAT IT IS. AS WE CONDUCT BUSINESS TONIGHT, WE PRAY FOR YOUR WISDOM. IN JESUS NAME WE PRAY. AMEN. AMEN. I PLEDGE ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AND TO THE REPUBLIC FOR WHICH IT STANDS. ONE NATION UNDER GOD, INDIVISIBLE, WITH LIBERTY AND JUSTICE FOR ALL. THANK YOU SO VERY MUCH. WE APPRECIATE YOU. THIS TIME. AND IF YOU'LL CALL THE ROLL, PLEASE. MR. HALL HERE, MR. JORDAN HERE, MISS MARSHALL HERE, MR. STAMPS HERE. MR. ROBBINS HERE. THANK YOU. THE 
          [4. APPROVAL OF AGENDA (Additions/Deletions)]
NEXT ITEM OF BUSINESS IS APPROVAL OF THE AGENDA. MISS MAYNOR, ARE THERE ANY CHANGES, DELETIONS, CORRECTIONS TO OUR AGENDA THIS EVENING, MAYOR? NO CHANGES THIS EVENING. OKAY. IS THERE A MOTION TO APPROVE THE AGENDA? MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE THE AGENDA. SECOND, WE HAVE A MOTION AND A SECOND, MISS DIAMOND, IF YOU'LL CALL THE ROLL, PLEASE, MR. JORDAN. 
          YES, MISS MARSHALL? YES. MR. STAMPS. YES. MR. ROBBINS. YES. MR. HALL. YES. MAYOR FRAZIER. 
          [5. APPROVAL OF MINUTES]
YES. THE AGENDA HAS BEEN APPROVED. WE HAVE TWO SETS OF MINUTES FOR APPROVAL. THE FIRST IS FROM A WORK SESSION ON JUNE 11TH, 2026. IF EVERYONE'S HAD A CHANCE TO REVIEW THE MINUTES. 
          ARE THERE ANY CHANGES? CORRECTIONS ON THOSE MINUTES? IF NONE. IS THERE A MOTION, PLEASE. MOTION TO APPROVE THE MINUTES. SECOND, I HAVE A MOTION AND A SECOND, MISS DIAMOND, IF YOU'LL CALL THE ROLL, PLEASE, MISS MARSHALL. YES. MR. STAMPS. YES. MR. ROBBINS. YES. MR. HALL. YES. MR. JORDAN. YES. MAYOR FRAZIER. YES. THOSE MINUTES ARE APPROVED, AND WE HAVE ANOTHER SET OF MINUTES FROM OUR BOARD OF MAYOR AND ALDERMEN MEETING ON THE 22ND OF JUNE. ARE THERE ANY CHANGES OR CORRECTIONS TO THOSE MINUTES? SEEING NONE, IS THERE A MOTION, PLEASE? MOTION TO APPROVE. SECOND, WE HAVE A MOTION AND A SECOND, MISS DIAMOND, IF YOU'LL CALL THE ROLL, MR. STAMPS. YES. MR. ROBBINS. YES. MR. HALL. YES. 
          MR. JORDAN. YES. MISS. MARSHALL. YES. MAYOR. FRAZIER. YES. THOSE MINUTES ARE APPROVED. THANK YOU VERY MUCH. DO WE HAVE ANY SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS THIS EVENING, MISS MAYNARD? NO 
          [7. CITIZENS COMMENTS]
SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS, MAYOR. SPECIAL PRESENTATION, AND WE'LL MOVE TO CITIZEN COMMENTS. WE DO HAVE A CITIZEN COMMENT PORTION IN ALL OF OUR MEETINGS, AND I HAVE RECEIVED TWO COMMENT CARDS. 
          THEY ARE PERTAINING TO AN ITEM THAT'S ON CONSENT. SO WE'LL LET THESE TWO INDIVIDUALS SPEAK. 
          FIRST, LET ME GO THROUGH A FEW OF THE RULES. WE LET ME FIND MY CHEAT SHEET HERE. YOU'RE GIVEN THREE MINUTES. IF YOU COME TO THE FRONT, IF YOU STATE YOUR NAME AND ADDRESS. FOR THE RECORD, OUR MEETINGS ARE LIVE STREAMED AND HOPEFULLY MAKE SURE YOU TALK INTO THE MICROPHONE WHEN YOU SEE THE LIGHT GREEN START. WHEN IT GETS TO YELLOW, YOU NEED TO WRAP UP YOUR COMMENTS. AND IT IS. WE'RE LISTENING. THERE'S NOT SO MUCH OPPORTUNITY FOR FEEDBACK ON YOUR COMMENTS, BUT WE DO WELCOME YOUR COMMENTS. SO THE FIRST CARD THAT I HAVE RECEIVED IS FROM MISS BARBARA PRATT, MISS PRATT. GOOD EVENING. GOOD EVENING. THANK YOU. BARBARA PRATT 130. PEYTON RUN LOOP, EAST COLLIERVILLE. AND I'D LIKE TO SPEAK TO THE PROPOSED LOCATION OF THE TRASH COMPACTOR FOR PHASE TWO OF THE WATERTOWN WATER TOWER DISTRICT DEVELOPMENT. THE RESIDENTS OF PORTER FARMS APPRECIATE THE FOCUS OF THE TOWN AND THE DEVELOPER ON PROVIDING SCREENING AND LANDSCAPING TO SHIELD THE PROPOSED TRASH COMPACTOR. HOWEVER, WE STILL WANT TO CONTINUE TO VOICE OUR CONCERNS AS TO THE DISTANCE OF THE COMPACTOR TO THE NEARBY RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS. THE CURRENT WATER TOWER COMPACTOR SITE IS SURROUNDED BY COMMERCIAL BUILDINGS, OTHER APARTMENTS AND PARKING LOTS, WHICH COULD ALSO BE ACHIEVED IF THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF PHASE TWO PROJECT PRODUCT PROJECT, WHICH IS ADJACENT TO COMMERCIALLY ZONED PROPERTY AND THE NEW HOTEL COMPACTOR, IS 
          [00:05:02]
UTILIZED REGARDLESS OF PROPERTY MANAGEMENT'S BEST EFFORTS. OUR CONCERNS ARE ESCALATED BY HUMAN NATURE'S DISREGARD FOR THE USE OF TRASH RECEPTACLES, CREATING CONCERNS OF PESTS, SMELLS AND CONTAMINATION. WE HAVE WITNESSED OVERFLOWING AND IMPROPER USE OF MORE THAN ONE COMPLEX DUMPSTER IN COLLIERVILLE. OUR CONCERNS OF THE PROXIMITY IMPACT ARE EQUAL TO, OR MORE PRESSING THAN THAT OF LANDSCAPE SCREENING, FOREMOST BEING VECTOR CONTROL. 
          COMPACTORS ACT AS A PRIMARY ATTRACTANT FOR RODENTS, INSECTS AND OTHER PESTS AT THE PROPOSED GIVE OR TAKE 100 FOOT DISTANCE, THESE VECTORS ARE WELL WITHIN THE TRAVEL DISTANCE TO INFILTRATE NEARBY HOMES. RESEARCH RECOMMENDS DISTANCES OF GREATER THAN 250FT FROM A RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY. ADDITIONALLY, AIR QUALITY AND LEACHATE RUNOFF CONCERNS MAY IMPACT SOIL AND WATER QUALITY NEARBY. IN CONCLUSION, WE RESPECTFULLY REQUEST CONSIDERATION FROM THE DEVELOPMENT COMPANY TO RELOCATE THE COMPACTOR AWAY FROM THE RESIDENTIAL STRUCTURES TO A MORE ENVIRONMENTALLY SUITED LOCATION. POTENTIALLY, THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE PROJECT SEEMS SUITABLE AS IT IS ADJACENT TO THE EXISTING HOTEL COMPACTOR AND COMMERCIALLY ZONED PROPERTY. THANKS FOR YOUR TIME. APPRECIATE IT. THANK YOU, MISS PRATT. I APPRECIATE YOUR INPUT. THE NEXT CARD IS MR. DAVE RYAN, MR. RYAN. WELCOME BACK. THANK YOU. IT'S GOOD TO BE BACK. I WAS TRAVELING, I WAS OUT OF TOWN, DUSTY. VERY CASUAL ATTIRE. IT'S SUMMERTIME. YOU'RE YOU'RE GOOD. MY NAME IS DAVE RYAN. I LIVE AT 1412 PEYTON PARKWAY IN COLLIERVILLE. AND I WANT TO SPEAK TO YOU AS THE PRESIDENT OF THE HOA ON BEHALF OF THE 44 HOMES IN THE SUBDIVISION THERE. AS WE GO INTO THIS NEXT PHASE OF THE WATER TOWER DISTRICT, UNDOUBTEDLY WE'RE GOING TO SEE MORE TRAFFIC BASED ON RESULTS THAT WERE DONE BY THE CITY. WE HAVE ALREADY SEEN A 400% INCREASE IN TRAFFIC THROUGH THE NEIGHBORHOOD, AND THEY'RE GOING TO ADD A VERY SIMILAR NUMBER OF UNITS THERE. SO I'M GOING TO ASSUME THAT WE CAN FIGURE THAT THE WE'LL HAVE ANOTHER INCREASE SIMILAR TO THAT. THE CITY HAD PROMISED US THAT THEY WOULD DO THEIR BEST TO WORK WITH BOYLE AND TO STOP THE CONSTRUCTION TRAFFIC. AND WHILE THEY DID AN OKAY JOB OF THAT, THERE WAS A LOT OF VEHICLES GOING THROUGH THERE OFF AND ON. WE CHASED THEM DOWN, YELLED AND SCREAMED AT THEM, ASKED THEM NICELY. WE TRIED EVERYTHING WE COULD TO GET THEM TO NOT COME THROUGH THERE, BUT THEY CONTINUE TO DO SO. THE SIGNS ARE NOT PUNITIVE. THEY DON'T HAVE ANYTHING. IT SAYS CONSTRUCTION TRAFFIC IS PROHIBITED. SO WHAT WE'RE GOING TO BE DOING IS WE'RE GOING TO COME TO YOUR ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT, TRAFFIC ENGINEERING, AND COME TO THE CHANNELS, AND WE'RE GOING TO MAKE SOME ASKS. 
          WE'RE GOING TO ASK FOR SOME STOP SIGNS. WE'RE GOING TO ASK FOR SOME SPEED BUMPS. ALSO SOME WEIGHT RESTRICTIONS THAT HAVE FINES FOR THEM. WHEN YOU BRING, YOU KNOW, A TRUCK THAT IS TOO HEAVY, IT TEARS UP THE ROADS AND IT'S ALSO DANGEROUS. SO WE'RE GOING TO BE TALKING TO THE TRAFFIC ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT AND HOPE THAT WE CAN COUNT ON THE COUNCIL TO SUPPORT OUR REQUESTS. AND WE ALSO ARE VERY CONCERNED ABOUT THE SPEED. AND WHEN THE TRAFFIC SURVEYS WERE DONE, WE DID SEE THESE RESULTS. WE HAD OFFICERS OUT THERE OFF AND ON FOR 4 OR 5 DAYS, AND WHEN THEY WERE THERE, WE SAW THE TRAFFIC SLOW DOWN DRAMATICALLY. AND THEN AS SOON AS THEY LEFT, IT TURNED INTO A RACEWAY AGAIN. SO WE'RE GOING TO BE ASKING THE POLICE DEPARTMENT IF THEY CAN COME OUT AND VISIT US AND SEE THAT. AND WHILE THEY WERE THERE, THEY EVEN HAD A DIGITAL READOUT, WHICH I'M SURE HAD TO MAKE SOME INTERESTING CONVERSATIONS WHEN IT WAS. DID YOU NOT SEE THE SPEED LIMIT SIGN DOWN THERE WITH THE DIGITAL READOUT? SO I JUST WANTED TO COME AND EXPRESS OUR CONCERNS ABOUT THE TRAFFIC AND ASK FOR YOUR SUPPORT GOING FORWARD ON THIS. THANKS, RYAN. THANK YOU. THOSE ARE THE ONLY COMMENT CARDS I RECEIVED THIS EVENING. SO WE WILL CLOSE THE PUBLIC COMMENT PORTION OF THE AGENDA. THE NEXT ITEM ON THE 
          [8. CONSENT AGENDA]
AGENDA IS THE CONSENT AGENDA AND IT'S ITEMS EIGHT A THROUGH EIGHT F. IS THERE ANYONE ON THE BOARD THAT WOULD LIKE AN ITEM PULLED FOR FURTHER DISCUSSION OR PRESENTATION? SEEING NONE, IS THERE A MOTION TO APPROVE THE CONSENT AGENDA? MOVE TO APPROVE THE CONSENT AGENDA? SECOND, WE HAVE A MOTION AND A SECOND, ANY FURTHER DISCUSSION? SEEING NONE, MISS DIAMOND, IF YOU'LL CALL THE ROLL, PLEASE. MR. ROBBINS? YES. MR. HALL. YES. MR. JORDAN. YES, MISS. MARSHALL. 
          YES. MR. STAMPS. YES. MAYOR FRAZIER. YES. THE CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS ARE APPROVED. THE 
          [9.A Appointment of Mr. James Lewellen to the MLGW Board of Commissioners]
          [00:10:01]
NEXT ITEM IS BUSINESS ITEM IS THE APPOINTMENT OF MR. JAMES LEWELLEN TO THE MEMPHIS LIGHT GAS AND WATER BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS. AND MISS MAINOR, OUR TOWN ADMINISTRATOR, HAS OUR PRESENTATION. MR. MAYOR. THANK YOU. MAYOR. THE PURPOSE OF THIS AGENDA ITEM IS TO APPOINT MR. JAMES LEWELLEN TO SERVE ON THE BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS AS A VOTING MEMBER FOR A THREE YEAR TERM. MEMPHIS LIGHT GAS AND WATER IS GOVERNED BY A BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS THAT CONTAINS FIVE. CURRENTLY CONTAINS FIVE VOTING MEMBERS AND TWO MEMBERS THAT ARE ADVISORY IN NATURE, AND THOSE TWO ADVISORY POSITIONS HAVE BEEN HELD BY MR. JAMES LEWELLEN, FORMER TOWN ADMINISTRATOR, AND MR. JOHN BUTLER, PRESIDENT OF AGRICENTER INTERNATIONAL, THE TENNESSEE GENERAL ASSEMBLY, IN THIS LAST SESSION PASSED LEGISLATION THAT WOULD PROVIDE FOR UTILITIES IN EXCESS OF 130,000 CUSTOMERS TO HAVE TWO ADDITIONAL VOTING MEMBERS TO BE PROVIDED BY THE MUNICIPALITIES WITHIN THEIR SERVICE AREA WITH THE LARGEST POPULATION. SO IN THIS CASE, COLLIERVILLE AND BARTLETT ARE PROVIDED THE PRIVILEGE OF APPOINTING THOSE VOTING MEMBERS. 
          I KNOW THAT MAYOR FRAZIER AND MAYOR PARSONS HAVE CONSULTED THE MAYORS OF THE OTHER SUBURBS, AND ARE IN AGREEMENT THAT MR. LEWELLEN AND MR. BUTLER SHOULD CONTINUE IN THEIR ROLES ON THE BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS AS VOTING MEMBERS NOW TO PROVIDE REPRESENTATION FOR THE SUBURBS. 
          THIS IS A MAYORAL RECOMMENDATION WITH AFFIRMATION BY THE MAJORITY OF THE BOARD, AND I WOULD BE HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS. AND I ALSO KNOW THAT MR. LEWELLEN IS HERE AS WELL. MR. LEWELLEN, WOULD YOU LIKE TO MAKE A PRESENTATION OR BE AVAILABLE FOR QUESTIONS? BUT YOU DO ACCEPT THIS APPOINTMENT, IS THAT CORRECT? YES. THANK YOU VERY MUCH. THANK YOU, THANK YOU, THANK YOU VERY. SO THE MOTION WOULD DO I MAKE THE MOTION? YES. I WILL MAKE A MOTION TO APPOINT MR. JAMES LEWELLEN TO THE BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS FOR A THREE YEAR TERM BEGINNING IN THIS MONTH, JULY OF 2026. THANK YOU. I HAVE A MOTION AND A SECOND. MISS TIMON, IF YOU CALL THE ROLL, PLEASE, MR. HALL. YES. MR. JORDAN. YES, MISS MARSHALL. YES. MR. STAMPS. YES. MR. ROBINS. YES. MAYOR FRAZIER. YES. AND THANK YOU VERY MUCH FOR YOUR WILLINGNESS. IT'S A BIG 
          [10.A Ordinance 2026-07 – Second Reading and Public Hearing – South Street Rezoning – An Ordinance Amending the Official Zoning Map of the Town of Collierville by Rezoning 0.801 Acres from R-3: High Density Residential to TN: Traditional Neighborhood Located South of West South Street and East of Sycamore Road, Case #261049]
JOB. OKAY. THE NEXT AGENDA ITEM IS ORDINANCE AND RESOLUTIONS. WE HAVE A SECOND READING AND A PUBLIC HEARING ON THE SOUTH STREET REZONING. DON SINGLETON, OUR ASSISTANT TOWN PLANNER, HAS OUR PRESENTATION. MISS SINGLETON. YES, MA'AM. THANK YOU. GOOD EVENING, AND THANK YOU FOR YOUR TIME TODAY. THE PURPOSE OF THIS AGENDA ITEM IS FOR APPROVAL OF A REZONING FROM R3 HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL TO TEA IN TRADITIONAL NEIGHBORHOOD FOR FOUR LOTS TOTALING 0.8 ACRES. THE SUBJECT ADDRESSES ARE 187, ONE, 81177 AND 171 WEST SOUTH STREET. THE APPLICANT IS SHEILA MCCAULEY, WHO IS ALSO ONE OF THE PROPERTY OWNERS. THE OTHER TWO PROPERTY OWNERS ARE JAMES WILSON AND TIMOTHY BRUNSON. EACH LOT CURRENTLY HAS AN EXISTING DWELLING ON ON THEM, AND THE PROPERTIES ARE LOCATED SOUTH OF WEST WEST SOUTH STREET AND JUST EAST OF SYCAMORE ROAD. HERE YOU'LL SEE A COMPARISON OF MAP SHOWING THE CURRENT ZONING AND PROPOSED ZONING. YOU'LL SEE THAT THE TEN ZONING DISTRICT HAS SMALLER SETBACK REQUIREMENTS, IN CONTRAST TO THE R-3 ZONING DISTRICT, YOU'LL SEE THIS REQUEST. THIS REQUEST TO REZONE WILL ALSO WILL ONLY AFFECT THE ZONING DESIGNATION, AND THE PROPERTIES WILL CONTINUE TO REMAIN AS SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL USES. IF ANY NEW HOMES WERE TO BE BUILT ON THESE LOTS, ANY OF THESE LOTS, THE HGC COULD REQUIRE LARGER SETBACKS SINCE THESE PROPERTIES ARE WITHIN THE LOCAL HISTORIC DISTRICT OVERLAY, BUT THEY ARE NOT ELIGIBLE FOR THE NATIONAL REGISTER. THE HGC WILL HAVE TO REVIEW ANY DEMOLITIONS OR ANY NEW STRUCTURES PROPOSED FOR ANY OF THESE LOTS. REZONING THE PROPERTY SUPPORTS THE GOALS OF THE 2010 DOWNTOWN DOWNTOWN SMALL AREA PLAN AND THE CURRENT LAND USE PLAN, AS IT ENCOURAGES SINGLE FAMILY INFILL DEVELOPMENT WITHIN THE TRADITIONAL NEIGHBORHOOD CHARACTER AREA ALONG ALONG SOUTH STREET, AND THE DENSITIES WILL REMAIN UNCHANGED WITH THE EXISTING DENSITY OF 4.9 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE, WHICH DOES MEET THE RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE LAND USE PLAN. LASTLY, THERE ARE FORM BASED DESIGN STANDARDS FOR THE TRADITIONAL NEIGHBORHOOD ZONING DISTRICT, AND THOSE ARE WITHIN OUR ZONING ORDINANCE, AND THIS WILL HELP ESTABLISH A HISTORIC CHARACTER AND A NEIGHBORHOOD PATTERN WITHIN THE VICINITY. THE EXISTING HOMES ARE ALREADY CONNECTED TO TOWN UTILITIES AND ROADWAYS, SO THINGS SUCH AS TRAFFIC IMPACTS AS WELL AS 
          [00:15:03]
WATER AND SEWER WON'T INCREASE SINCE THESE PROPERTIES WILL REMAIN AS SINGLE FAMILY DWELLINGS. AND THIS DOES CONCLUDE MY PRESENTATION. THE EXAMPLE MOTIONS ON YOUR SCREEN TO APPROVE ORDINANCE 2026-07 ON THE SECOND READING PUBLIC HEARING, AND I AM AVAILABLE FOR QUESTIONS IF YOU HAVE ANY. THANK YOU, THANK YOU. ARE THERE ANY QUESTIONS FOR STAFF? YES, MA'AM. ALDERMAN JORDAN, WHAT CHANGES WILL TAKE PLACE BY REZONING THIS? THE SETBACKS ARE LESS RESTRICTIVE. SO WHAT ARE YOU SAYING? THEY COULD GO IN AND WHAT CAN MAKE IMPROVEMENTS JUST BECAUSE IT'S IN A TRADITIONAL NEIGHBORHOOD BY MAKING IMPROVEMENTS, THAT'S THE ONLY CHANGE. SO MY UNDERSTANDING, THE APPLICANT OWNS ONE OF THE HOUSES AND SHE DOES PLAN TO DEMOLISH IT AND BUILD A NEW HOME. AND BECAUSE OF THE CURRENT LOT DOESN'T EVEN MEET THE R-3 ZONING DISTRICTS. SO IF SHE WERE TO GO BACK AND REBUILD BASED ON THE CURRENT EXISTING EXISTING ZONING, WHICH IS R-3, SHE WOULD HAVE AN UNBUILDABLE LOT. SO OUR TEN MAKES IT MORE BUILDABLE. SHE GETS A MORE BUILDABLE AREA. OKAY, SO SHE CAN ONLY DO IT THROUGH ONE HOUSE. IS THAT CORRECT? YES. ON HER LOT SHE WOULD BE ABLE TO BUILD ONE HOUSE, AND EACH LOT OWNER WOULD BE ABLE TO BUILD ONE HOUSE ON THEIR LOT. ANY OTHER QUESTIONS? THIS IS A PUBLIC HEARING. IS THERE ANYONE IN THE AUDIENCE THAT WOULD LIKE TO ADDRESS THE BOARD THIS EVENING? PAY THAT PUBLIC HEARING IS CLOSED. IS THERE A MOTION? MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE ORDINANCE 2026-07 ON SECOND READING. SECOND, WE HAVE A MOTION IN A SECOND. ANY FURTHER DISCUSSION? SEEING NONE, MISS DIAMOND, IF YOU CALL THE ROLL, PLEASE, MR. JORDAN. YES, MISS MARSHALL, YES. MR. STAMPS. YES. MR. ROBBINS. YES. MR. HALL. YES. MAYOR FRAZIER. YES. THAT 
          [10.B Resolution 2026-10 - Public Hearing – A Resolution to Amend the Hinton Preserve Planned Development (PD), Case #260830]
HAS BEEN APPROVED. THANK YOU, THANK YOU. THE NEXT AGENDA ITEM IS A PUBLIC HEARING. IT'S A RESOLUTION TO AMEND THE HINTON PRESERVE PLAN DEVELOPMENT. AND ALLISON EDWARDS HAS OUR PLANNER. 
          THREE, I GUESS, IS YOUR OFFICIAL TITLE HAS OUR PRESENTATION, MISS EDWARDS. 
          THANK YOU, MAYOR AND BOARD. SO THIS IS A REQUEST TO AMEND THE HINTON PRESERVE PLAN DEVELOPMENT. THE HINTON PRESERVE PD WAS ORIGINALLY APPROVED IN 2022 FOR 84 SINGLE FAMILY LOTS. IT WOULD INCLUDE PUBLIC ROADS AND PUBLIC SIDEWALKS THAT WOULD CONNECT TO ADJACENT SUBDIVISIONS. THE REQUESTED AMENDMENT WOULD CONVERT THOSE PUBLIC ROADS AND PUBLIC SIDEWALKS TO PRIVATE ROADS AND PRIVATE SIDEWALKS, AND THOSE WOULD ALSO BE GATED. 
          SO THE PLANNING COMMISSION HEARD THIS AMENDMENT REQUEST AND THE PLANNING COMMISSION, IN A 4 TO 1 VOTE, RECOMMENDED DENIAL. THE REASONS THAT THEY STATED FOR RECOMMENDING DENIAL ARE THE NEGATIVE IMPACTS THAT THIS WOULD HAVE TO VEHICULAR AND PEDESTRIAN CONNECTIVITY, ESPECIALLY IN AN AREA WHERE WE THINK WE WILL SEE HIGH GROWTH IN THE FUTURE. RIGHT NOW, FLEMING ROAD RECEIVES ABOUT 600 AVERAGE DAILY TRIPS. WE EXPECT THAT IN THE FUTURE TO SIGNIFICANTLY INCREASE. WHEN WE LOOK AT 2050 BUILD OUT NUMBERS, ADDITIONAL REASONS THAT THE PLANNING COMMISSION CITED FOR RECOMMENDING DENIAL IS A 2022 CONDITION OF APPROVAL. WHEN THIS PD WAS ORIGINALLY APPROVED, THERE WAS A CONDITION OF APPROVAL THAT STATED THAT THE PUBLIC ACCESS SHOULD REMAIN PERMANENTLY OPEN TO THE PUBLIC. OTHER REASONS THAT THE PLANNING COMMISSION STATED FOR RECOMMENDING DENIAL IS A 2040 LAND USE PLAN LAYS OUT A VISION OF AN INTERCONNECTED ROAD SYSTEM FOR COLLIERVILLE. ADDITIONALLY, OUR SUBDIVISION REGULATIONS REQUIRE DEVELOPMENTS TO PROVIDE PUBLIC ACCESS THAT IS PERMANENTLY OPEN, AND THEY ALSO REQUIRE SUBDIVISIONS THAT ARE ADJACENT TO DEVELOPED SUBDIVISIONS TO PROVIDE THAT CONNECTIVITY FOR EXISTING ROADS. OUR CODE DOES ALLOW FOR PRIVATE GATED NEIGHBORHOODS IN CERTAIN CIRCUMSTANCES, AND THOSE CASES ARE WHERE A NEIGHBORHOOD HAS LIMITED FRONTAGE, OR IF THERE ARE NATURAL FEATURES OR OTHER CIRCUMSTANCES THAT WOULD PRECLUDE THOSE REQUIRED CONNECTIONS. AND ALL OF THESE REGULATIONS ARE PROVIDED IN EXHIBIT EIGHT IN YOUR PACKET. THE APPLICANTS HAVE PROVIDED SOME ADDITIONAL COMMENT THAT IS ON IN FRONT OF YOU THIS EVENING, AND THEY ALSO DID PROVIDE SOME LETTERS OF SUPPORT FROM NEIGHBORS OF THE NEARBY MAGNOLIA PRESERVE SUBDIVISION. SO THIS IS THE AREA IN QUESTION. 
          YOU CAN SEE HERE. HINTON PRESERVE SUBDIVISION IS THE FURTHEST TO THE EAST. AND THEN 
          [00:20:01]
YOU HAVE FLEMING GARDENS IN THE MIDDLE. THAT SUBDIVISION WAS PLATTED IN 2021 AND IS FULLY BUILT OUT. AND THEN WHEN YOU GO TO THE WEST, YOU HAVE LOCKWOOD SUBDIVISION. THAT SUBDIVISION IS CURRENTLY UNDER CONSTRUCTION, SO LOCKWOOD WAS PROVIDED TO HAVE TWO CONNECTIONS ONTO HOUSTON LEVEE ROAD. THEY WERE ALSO REQUIRED TO PROVIDE ONE CONNECTION TO THE VACANT LOT TO THE NORTH. AND AS YOU CAN SEE THERE, THEY WERE ALSO PROVIDED TO CONNECT TO A STUB STREET THAT WAS IN FLEMING GARDENS. FLEMING GARDENS WAS PROVIDED. WAS REQUIRED TO PROVIDE TWO CONNECTIONS TO SHELBY DRIVE. ONE CONNECTION TO FLEMING ROAD VIA MIDNIGHT SUN. AND THEN ONE CONNECTION TO LOCKWOOD, AND THEN ONE CONNECTION TO HINTON PRESERVE. IN ADDITION TO THESE VEHICULAR CONNECTIONS, ALL OF THESE SUBDIVISIONS WERE REQUIRED TO PROVIDE PEDESTRIAN CONNECTIONS THAT CONNECTED ALL THREE NEIGHBORHOODS, AND ALSO PEDESTRIAN CONNECTIONS THAT WOULD HOOK UP TO COLLIERVILLE, GREENBELT TO THE SOUTH. THAT WOULD PROVIDE ACCESS TO HINTON PARK. SO THIS IS A ZOOM OUT OF THE AREA. WE WERE JUST LOOKING AT. AND YOU CAN SEE HERE IN ORANGE, IT MAY NOT SHOW UP REALLY WELL, BUT THESE ARE THE AREAS THAT THE APPLICANT WOULD PROPOSE TO HAVE GATES. SO RIGHT HERE AT THE CONNECTION TO FLEMING GARDENS, THE CONNECTION TO HINTON PARK, THE SIDEWALK CONNECTION TO FLEMING ROAD AND THE VEHICULAR CONNECTION TO FLEMING ROAD. THE APPLICANTS HAVE STATED THEY WOULD BE WILLING TO LEAVE THE GATES OPEN DURING THE HINTON PARK HOURS OF OPERATION. RIGHT NOW, THAT PARK IS OPEN 6 A.M. TO 8 P.M. THE PARK DOES HAVE A MASTER PLAN THAT SHOWS FUTURE EXPANSION, AND THAT WOULD INCLUDE ADDITIONAL BALL FIELDS. SO THERE IS THE POTENTIAL THAT THE PARK'S HOURS OF OPERATION COULD EXPAND TO ACCOUNT FOR MORE BALL GAMES BEING PLAYED IN THE SUMMERTIME, PERHAPS SIMILAR TO TO TO JOHNSON PARK. JOHNSON PARK STAYS OPEN MUCH LATER. ANOTHER CONCERN THAT THE PLANNING COMMISSION HAD WAS IF THE IF THE AMENDMENT REQUEST IS APPROVED AND THERE IS A CONDITION OF APPROVAL THAT THE GATES MUST REMAIN OPEN TO COINCIDE WITH THE PARK HOURS. 
          AND IF THE PARK HOURS DO CHANGE OVER TIME, WOULD THAT HELP THE APPLICANT MEET THE STATED GOAL, WHICH IS TO PROVIDE A GATED COMMUNITY FOR THEIR RESIDENTS? KNOWING THAT THESE GATES WOULD BE OPEN THE MAJORITY OF THE TIME IF THAT WAS A CONDITION OF APPROVAL. SO THAT BEING SAID, PLANNING COMMISSION AND STAFF ARE BOTH RECOMMENDING DENIAL OF THIS PD AMENDMENT. FOR THE REASONS STATED ON THE SCREEN. IT IS A LONG FLEMING ROAD, WHICH IS A MINOR COLLECTOR WHICH IS NEAR LARGE TRACTS OF DEVELOPABLE LAND. IT'S ADJACENT TO A PUBLIC PARK AND IT'S ADJACENT TO SUBDIVISIONS WHERE WE'VE HAD VEHICULAR AND PEDESTRIAN CONNECTIONS PLANNED FOR OVER 25 YEARS. IT DOES NOT COMPLY WITH THE TOWN'S TRANSPORTATION AND LAND USE POLICIES, AND IT DOES NOT COMPLY WITH PRIOR PCI AND BMA CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR THIS PLANNED DEVELOPMENT. SO THERE IS A MOTION ON YOUR SCREEN. WE ALWAYS MAKE MOTIONS IN THE AFFIRMATIVE. SO THE MOTION IS TO APPROVE RESOLUTION 2026 TEN. AND I WILL BE HAPPY TO TAKE ANY QUESTIONS. OKAY. THANK YOU VERY MUCH. ARE THERE ANY QUESTIONS FOR STAFF? YES. ALDERMAN JORDAN FOR GATES CLOSING THIS SUBDIVISION IN, IS THAT CORRECT? THAT WOULD BE CORRECT. SO THAT MEANS THAT FOR GATES HERE, YOU PUT IN THE LABS OF ALL THESE PEOPLE IN THE HANDS OF SOMEBODY WHO GOT THE KEY TO THE GATE. RIGHT. SAY THAT AGAIN. I'M SORRY. THAT MEANS THAT YOU'RE PUTTING ALL THE PEOPLE IN THIS SUBDIVISION WELL-BEING OR LIVES SUBJECT TO THE PEOPLE OR THE PERSON WHO HAS ACCESS TO THE KEY TO THESE GATES. SO AT NIGHT, YOU'RE GOING TO LOCK THEM ALL IN OR WHAT? I DON'T UNDERSTAND WHAT WHY WOULD YOU WANT TO CLOSE UP THE WHOLE SUBDIVISION WITH FOUR GATES ALL AROUND EVERY YEAR? I THINK THAT WOULD BE A REALLY GOOD QUESTION FOR THE APPLICANT. OKAY, HOLD ON TO THAT. SO I WILL ASK THAT QUESTION. ARE YOU AWARE OF ANY WHEN YOU HAVE THE TRAFFIC, ARE THERE CARS THAT WOULD PROPOSE TO GO INTO FLEMING GARDENS OR LOCKWOOD? AND DO THEY PARK IN THESE NEIGHBORHOODS AND THEN USE THAT PEDESTRIAN ACCESS TO 
          [00:25:01]
GET TO HINTON PARK CURRENTLY, SO THAT I'M NOT AWARE OF IF THERE ARE COLLIERVILLE RESIDENTS COMING IN FROM OTHER NEIGHBORHOODS TO USE THOSE PEDESTRIAN FACILITIES. BUT I DO KNOW THAT THE RESIDENTS OF LOCKWOOD AND FLEMING GARDENS USE THOSE. BECAUSE IF YOU YOU MENTIONED THAT THIS IS A MAJOR. FLEMING IS A MAJOR COLLECTOR. WHAT HAPPENS WHEN PEOPLE GO DOWN. FLEMING. BECAUSE THERE'S NO OTHER DEVELOPMENT IN THAT. I MEAN, THERE IS ACROSS THE STREET, BUT NOT IN THAT LITTLE CORRIDOR THERE, POSSIBLY TO THE NORTH. BUT WHAT IS GOING TO PREVENT CITIZENS FROM COMING INTO THEIR NEIGHBORHOOD TO PARK AND THEN WALK IF THEY'RE IF IT'S AS IT IS NOW, HYPOTHETICALLY, TO WALK ACROSS TO THE BALL FIELDS AND INSTEAD OF PARKING IN HIDDEN PARK, I MEAN, THAT COULD THEORETICALLY HAPPEN. IT COULD AND IT COULD HAPPEN IN LOCKWOOD. IT COULD HAPPEN IN FLEMING GARDENS. THAT'S CORRECT. YES, IT COULD HAPPEN IN ANY NEIGHBORHOOD THAT'S IN CLOSE PROXIMITY TO A PARK. OKAY. ALL RIGHT. THANK YOU. YES, ALDERMAN ROBINSON, THANK YOU. HIS FIRE CHIEF SELBERG OR ANYONE DOING THE REVIEW OF THIS EXPRESSED A ACTUAL CONCERN, OR IS THERE A SPECULATIVE CONCERN FROM THAT PERSPECTIVE? WELL, YOU KNOW, FIRES ONLY COMMENT HAS BEEN THAT IT HAS THE POTENTIAL TO SLOW EMERGENCY RESPONSE. BUT THEY ALWAYS HAVE A WAY TO GET IN. SO NOT NECESSARILY AN ISSUE, JUST A BLANKET STATEMENT. OBVIOUSLY, WE WOULD LOVE FIVE MORE ACCESS POINTS AS WELL, RIGHT? TEN MORE WOULD BE EVEN BETTER. AND ANYTHING THAT IMPEDES THE ABILITY TO MOVE QUICKLY IS NEVER IDEAL. CORRECT. AND. I'LL HAVE A QUESTION FOR THE APPLICANT AS WELL. BUT. I THINK THAT'S ALL FOR NOW. THANK YOU. OKAY. THANK YOU. CHIEF WITT OR CHIEF SELBERG. DID YOU HAVE ANYTHING TO ADD TO THAT ANSWER TO THAT QUESTION? RELUCTANTLY HE'S COMING FORWARD. 
          I CAN ASK AGAIN IF YOU'D LIKE. I'M SORRY, CHIEF WHIP. FOR THOSE THAT DON'T KNOW, CHIEF JOHNSON PROVIDED THE INPUT FOR THE PLANNING COMMISSION THROUGH THE FIRE MARSHAL'S OFFICE. WE ALWAYS HAVE A PLAN FOR EMERGENCY GATES THAT HAVE BEEN PUT IN ACROSS THE TOWN, MEANING IT'S A CLICK TO ENTER TYPE SYSTEM, RADIO FREQUENCY CONTROL THAT BOTH EMS FIRE AND POLICE HAVE ACCESS TO. WE ALWAYS ARE OPPOSED TO THE DELAY WHERE THE DELAY IS SPEED HUMPS OR WHATEVER, OR THE GATE ACCESS OR THE OTHER. WE ARE ALWAYS OPPOSED TO THAT. AND EVERYTHING THAT YOU PUT INTO PLACE DELAYS OUR RESPONSE. SO WE STICK TO THAT AS A RECOMMENDATION. SO DOES THAT HELP? YES. THANK YOU VERY MUCH. WELL, WAIT WAIT A MINUTE. SO THE FIRE DEPARTMENT OPPOSED TO THIS WHERE WE ARE, WE TRY TO STAY NEUTRAL TO THAT OTTOMAN. WE HAVE ACCESS POINTS THAT WE INTENTIONALLY PUT INTO PLAY, MEANING THAT WE HAVE A MEANS TO GET IN. SHOULD THIS GATE BE APPROVED BY THIS BOARD. SO WE DON'T LIKE TO BE THE GOVERNING BODY IN THAT INSTANCE. 
          SO WE HAVE A PLAN B IF WE NEED TO, IF THAT'S ADEQUATE. I HAVE A QUESTION. SO IF THERE WERE ANY LIKE REALLY SAFETY CONCERNS YOU WOULD HAVE AN OPINION. RIGHT. WELL THE DELAY IS THE SAFETY CONCERN. WE DON'T WANT ANY DELAY. WE HAVE ENOUGH TRAFFIC AND OTHER DELAYS THAT ARE BUILT INTO THE SYSTEM AND THE SUBDIVISIONS. THIS IS A NARROW ROAD GETTING INTO A LARGE SUBDIVISION AND FUTURE DEVELOPMENT TO THE SOUTH. SO ANYTHING IN THAT REALM BECOMES A DELAY TO US. AND SO WE PURPOSELY THREW THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT INTO THE PREVIOUS MEETINGS WITH THE SUBDIVISIONS, PUT THESE EMERGENCY ACCESS POINTS IN, WHICH IS THE CONNECTIVITY THAT WE'RE TALKING ABOUT. AND WE WILL NEVER BE FOR THOSE GATES. AND THE OPPOSING THING, I ONLY ASK BECAUSE I WASN'T HERE WHEN DEBRIS WAS. BUT YES, IT DOES ARE THERE. AND IT'S TO MY KNOWLEDGE, TO WHAT SHE JUST I'M SORRY, WHAT SHE DISCUSSED HERE WAS THERE WAS NO CONNECTIVITY LEAVING DEBRIS. AND YOU CAN CORRECT ME IF THAT'S INCORRECT, BUT I THINK THAT'S THE CASE. AND THERE'S SEVERAL GATED COMMUNITIES IN TOWN, AS WE ALL KNOW, THEY DON'T HAVE THE CONNECTIVITY THAT THIS ONE HAS IN PLAY IS WHAT MY ANSWER IS. YES, YES. 
          THANK YOU. APPRECIATE IT. THIS IS TIME TO HEAR FROM THE APPLICANT. IF YOU'LL STATE YOUR NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD, PLEASE. JOHN MCCARTHY MCCARTY ENGINEERING, 198 PROGRESS ROAD HERE IN CORALVILLE. I'M GOING TO GIVE YOU ALL SOME HIGHLIGHTS AND A LITTLE BIT OF DISCUSSION WE'VE HAD SINCE THE PLANNING COMMISSION AND WHITNEY HARVEY WITH MAGNOLIA HOMES IS GOING TO SPEAK TO SOME OF THE ISSUES AS WELL. AND HOPEFULLY WE'RE ABLE TO ANSWER YOUR QUESTIONS TO WHATEVER LEVEL YOU ALL HAVE. THE MAIN REASON THAT WE ARE ASKING FOR THIS IS IT'S DRIVEN BY HOMEOWNERS, HOME BUYERS ASKING. GERMANTOWN HAS RECENTLY APPROVED SEVERAL GATED 
          [00:30:01]
NEIGHBORHOODS, AND MAGNOLIA HOMES HAS FELT THE PRESSURE FROM THE SAME HOMEBUYERS. I'VE ACTUALLY WORKED ON SEVERAL OF THOSE PROJECTS IN GERMANTOWN, AND WE'VE. SOME OF THEM ACTUALLY BEEN CONVERTED FROM PRIVATE TO OR FROM PUBLIC TO PRIVATE AFTER THEY WERE PLATTED IN, THE HOMEOWNERS HAVE MOVED IN. SO THERE IS AN INTENTION, WHETHER IT'S THIS DEVELOPMENT OR OTHER DEVELOPMENTS IN THE CARNIVAL. AND ONE OF OUR HOPES TONIGHT IS TO AT LEAST START THAT CONVERSATION, BECAUSE WE ARE ALWAYS LOOKING TO TRY TO TAKE CARE OF THE HOMEBUYERS. 
          ONE OF THE ISSUES THAT THAT WE WOULD SAY THAT WE DISCUSSED A LOT AT THE PLANNING COMMISSION WAS THE TIMING OF THE GATES. I THINK AFTER A LOT OF THOUGHT AND A LOT OF LOOKING BACK, WE WOULD PROPOSE JUST TO HAVE THEM OPEN AT SIX IN THE MORNING TO 8 P.M. WHICH IS THE LATEST THE PARK CURRENTLY DOES. FROM A HOMEOWNER STANDPOINT, IF THE GATES ARE OPEN TO 11:00, THEY'RE PROBABLY NOT ACHIEVING WHAT THEY WANT TO ANYWAYS. I THINK ONE OF THE BIG ARGUMENTS THAT THE PLANNING COMMISSION WAS ABOUT ACCESS TO THE PARK, WHEN YOU THINK ABOUT IT, IT'S REALLY NOT A GOOD ARGUMENT. I WILL TRY TO DRAW UP HERE. I DID NOT DO VERY GOOD ON THURSDAY NIGHT DRAWING ON THIS, SO Y'ALL DON'T JUDGE ME. SO CURRENTLY THERE WE GO. WE'VE GOT ONE SIDEWALK CONNECTION IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD THAT'S GOING TO CONNECT TO THE PARK. IT DOESN'T CONNECT TO ANYTHING RIGHT NOW INSIDE THE PARK, BUT AT SOME POINT WE WOULD EXPECT THE PARK TO BUILD OUT. FLEMING GARDENS ALSO HAS A CONNECTION THAT IS ACTUALLY ACTIVE WITH A BRIDGE. 
          THE BRIDGE IS RIGHT THERE. AND SO RIGHT NOW, EVERYBODY IN FLEMING GARDENS OR LOCKWOOD CAN WALK TO THE FLEMING GARDENS, AND IT'S THEIR MOST CONVENIENT ASPECT. ANYBODY ELSE NORTH OF THE DEVELOPMENT WOULD HAVE THE ACCESS ALONG THE SIDEWALK THAT WE'RE BUILDING ALONG FLEMING TO GET DOWN TO THE PARK. SO WE WOULD NOT BE RESTRICTING PEDESTRIAN ACCESS IN ANY WAY TO THE PARK. IF IT'S SOMETHING WE NEED TO WORK TOGETHER ON, HOW DO WE, YOU KNOW, BUILD A SIDEWALK IN THAT SECTION OF THE PARK ADJACENT TO THE NEIGHBORHOOD? I'M SURE THAT WE WOULD BE WILLING TO DISCUSS ANYTHING ALONG THOSE LINES, BUT OUR GOAL IS TO MAINLY STATE THAT FROM SIX IN THE MORNING TO 8 P.M. WHICH HAVING THE GATES CLOSED AT 8 P.M. REALLY MEETS THE SAFETY DESIRE OF A LOT OF THE FUTURE HOMEBUYERS. ALLISON DID A GOOD JOB TALKING ABOUT FLEMING GARDENS, BUT SHE DID MENTION IT WAS PLATTED IN 2021. I THINK THAT WAS THIS SECTION, THIS STUB STREET THAT CONNECTS TO US WAS PLATTED IN 2005. AND WHILE THEY MAY HAVE ANTICIPATED AT SOME POINT CONNECTING, THEY HAVE MANAGED TO MAKE IT 21 YEARS, DRIVING THE NORMAL WAY OUT TO THE THREE MAIN ENTRANCES OF FLEMING GARDEN. BUT I THINK WITH MAGNOLIA HOMES PROMISING TO HAVE THE GATES OPEN DURING THE DAY, THAT SHOULD RELIEVE ALL OF THE CONCERN. I MEAN, I WOULD HOPE NOT MANY PEOPLE COME DOWN MY STREET AFTER 8:00. NOW. I KIND OF AM A HOMEBODY AND DON'T GO OUT LATE AT NIGHT. BUT FROM 6 A.M. TO 8 P.M. WE FEEL LIKE IT'S VERY ADEQUATE FOR FOR MAGNOLIA HOMES TO BUILD THE ROADS AND THE HOA TO CONTINUE TO MAINTAIN THE ROADS, BUT TO ALLOW EVERYBODY TO COME THROUGH THERE. AS CHIEF WITT DID STATE, THEY'VE GOT A LOT OF RULES WHEN IT COMES TO THE GATE. SEVERAL THE GATED NEIGHBORHOODS WE'VE DONE IN TOWN, THEY JUST MAKE US HAVE ALL THE CONNECTIONS AND ALL THE THE EMERGENCY VEHICLE AND ANYBODY ON THE INSIDE. WHEN YOU PULL UP TO THE GATES ON THE INSIDE, THERE'S AUTOMATIC DETECTIONS THAT OPEN THE GATES FOR YOU. SO IF YOU'RE IN THERE, YOU'RE NOT LOCKED IN THERE. ALDERMAN JORDAN, THE CAR PULLS UP THE GATE, KNOWS YOU'RE THERE, AND IT OPENS THE GATE AND LETS YOU LEAVE SO YOU CAN LEAVE AT ANY TIME YOU WANT TO. THE ONLY OTHER THING I WOULD SAY IS THAT IF THERE'S SOMETHING THAT WE CAN, YOU KNOW, THAT Y'ALL WOULD WANT OUT OF US, WE'D BE WILLING TO TO WORK WITH Y'ALL. WHITNEY IS GOING TO COME AND MAKE A PRESENTATION FROM THE, THE HOME BUYERS ASPECT AS WELL. GOOD EVENING, MAYOR AND ALDERMEN. MY NAME IS WHITNEY HARVEY WITH MAGNOLIA HOMES. ADDRESS IS 1933 CARTWRIGHT FARM LANE, AS WELL AS 250 WEST POPLAR IN COLLIERVILLE. SO RESIDENT AND EMPLOYEE IN COLLIERVILLE. THANK YOU FOR YOUR TIME THIS EVENING. I WON'T KEEP YOU VERY LONG. I KNOW THAT YOU MAY HAVE RECEIVED SOME KEY CONSIDERATIONS THAT WE WANTED TO POINT OUT. FIRST OF ALL, AS JOHN MENTIONED, MAGNOLIA HOMES COMMUNICATES WITH PROSPECTIVE HOMEBUYERS EVERY DAY, INCLUDING A SIGNIFICANT NUMBER OF RELOCATION EXECUTIVE AND MOVE UP BUYERS. ONE OF THE MOST CONSISTENT REQUESTS THAT WE RECEIVE IS FOR GATED COMMUNITIES. WE ARE MAKING THE REQUEST IN RESPONSE TO SOMETHING BUYERS ARE ALREADY ASKING FOR WITHIN OUR COMMUNITY. WE WOULD LOVE FOR THEM TO CHOOSE AND REMAIN IN COLLIERVILLE FOR THEIR NEXT HOME AND CONTINUE TO INVEST IN OUR COMMUNITY. FIRST POINT REGARDING HOUSING CHOICE. APPROVING THIS AMENDMENT WOULD EXPAND COLLIERVILLE HOUSING OPTIONS BY OFFERING A RESIDENTIAL PRODUCT THAT IS CURRENTLY LIMITED WITHIN OUR MARKET. A HEALTHY COMMUNITY BENEFITS FROM OFFERING A VARIETY OF HOUSING CHOICES THAT MEET EVOLVING PREFERENCES. THIS HELPS CONTINUE TO RETAIN AND ATTRACT, MOVE UP EXECUTIVE AND RELOCATION BUYERS. IT MAINTAINS COLLIERVILLE COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE, STRENGTHENS LONG 
          [00:35:05]
TERM RESIDENTIAL INVESTMENT. IN REGARDS TO ONE OF THE POINTS ABOUT CONNECTIVITY, WE COMPLETELY UNDERSTAND AND WE DO RESPECT THAT, AND WE UNDERSTAND THE LONG STANDING COMMITMENT TO CONNECTIVITY AND THE VISION OUTLINED IN THE LAND USE PLAN. THIS PROPOSAL IS NOT INTENDED TO ELIMINATE CONNECTIVITY, AS HOPEFULLY YOU HAVE SEEN, IT IS DESIGNED TO BALANCE COMMUNITY WITH HOMEOWNER PREFERENCES THROUGH MANAGED ACCESS, AND THIS IS WHY WE'RE WILLING TO LEAVE THEM OPEN DURING THE DAY IN THE MOST HIGHLY TRAFFICKED HOURS. MANAGED ACCESS RATHER THAN RESTRICTED ACCESS, WITH GATES OPEN DURING DESIGNATED PARK HOURS. WE HAVE SUBMITTED NUMEROUS SUPPORT LETTERS FOR GATE TO BE APPROVED FROM CURRENT MAGNOLIA PRESERVE HOMEOWNERS. WE ACTUALLY FEEL THIS COMMUNITY WOULD BE MOST GEOGRAPHICALLY AND DIRECTLY AFFECTED RATHER THAN FLEMING GARDENS IN REGARDS TO HINTON PARK, DUE TO THE FACT THAT FLEMING GARDENS ALREADY HAS THEIR OWN ACCESS, I THINK JOHN POINTED THAT OUT. IF YOU POINT OUT MAGNOLIA, LET ME KNOW. CONTINUE. PEDESTRIAN AND VEHICULAR ACCESSIBILITY DURING EXTENSIVE PEAK HOURS SHOULD ELIMINATE MOST OF THESE CONCERNS. PEN PRESERVE WAS DESIGNED AS A RESIDENTIAL NEIGHBORHOOD, NOT A TRANSPORTATION CORRIDOR. THE HOMES, RESIDENTS AND NEIGHBORHOOD TRAFFIC WOULD REMAIN UNCHANGED. RESIDENTS WILL CONTINUE UTILIZING THE FOLLOWING REGARDLESS OF WHETHER THE COMMUNITY IS GATED. THE PROPOSAL CHANGES ACCESS TO THE NEIGHBORHOOD, NOT THE NUMBER OF TRIPS GENERATED BY IT. APPROVAL ALSO PROVIDES SIGNIFICANT LONG TERM PUBLIC BENEFITS. STREETS AND SIDEWALKS WILL REMAIN PRIVATELY OWNED AND MAINTAINED. THEY WILL BE BUILT TO COLLIERVILLE CODE AND STANDARDS WHILE REMAINING PRIVATELY OWNED. FUTURE MAINTENANCE AND INFRASTRUCTURE COSTS REMAIN THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE PROPERTY OWNERS, NOT THE COLLIERVILLE TAXPAYERS. LONG TERM PUBLIC MAINTENANCE OBLIGATIONS ARE REDUCED. PEN PARK REMAINS AN IMPORTANT COMMUNITY ASSET. THE PROPOSED MANAGED ACCESS SCHEDULE INTENTIONALLY KEEPS THE GATES OPEN DURING DESIGNATED PARK HOURS, PRESERVING ACCESS DURING THE TIME RESIDENTS AND VISITORS ARE MOST LIKELY TO USE THE PARK. THE PROPOSAL SUPPORTS BOTH PUBLIC RECREATION AND HOMEOWNER PRIVACY. IN DOING SOME MARKET RESEARCH, WE HAVE FOUND THAT HOMES WITHIN GATED COMMUNITIES OFTEN COMMAND HIGHER VALUES THAN COMPARABLE NON-GATED HOMES. BUYERS CONSISTENTLY PLACE VALUE ON PRIVACY CONTROLLED ACCESS AND NEIGHBORHOOD QUALITY. HOMEOWNERS IN GATED COMMUNITIES FREQUENTLY MAKE GREATER LONG TERM INVESTMENTS IN THEIR HOMES AND NEIGHBORHOODS. PER OUR RESEARCH, STRONG PRIVATE INVESTMENT CONTRIBUTES TO HEALTHY PROPERTY VALUES AND A STRONG TAX BASE. ALL IN ALL, FOR NEARLY 40 YEARS, MAGNOLIA HOMES HAS BEEN COMMITTED TO BUILDING COMMUNITIES THAT ENHANCE COLLIERVILLE THROUGH THOUGHTFUL PLANNING, QUALITY CONSTRUCTION, AND LONG TERM STEWARDSHIP. WE REMAIN COMMITTED TO BEING RESPONSIBLE COMMUNITY PARTNERS AND TO CREATING NEIGHBORHOODS THAT CONTRIBUTE POSITIVELY TO COLLIERVILLE FUTURE. OUR ULTIMATE GOAL HERE IS TO PROVIDE ANOTHER HIGH QUALITY HOUSING OPTION WHILE PRESERVING WHILE PRESERVING THE CHARACTER, COMPETITIVENESS AND LONG TERM STRENGTH OF THE TOWN OF COLLIERVILLE. ONE THING WE KNOW IS THAT BUYERS HAVE MORE CHOICES THAN EVER BEFORE. OUR GOAL IS TO ENSURE COLLIERVILLE REMAINS THE COMMUNITY THEY CHOOSE. THANK YOU. THANK YOU VERY MUCH. APPRECIATE IT. QUESTIONS OF THE APPLICANT. I MAY HAVE ONE. IT'S MORE OF A CURIOSITY QUESTION. I THINK WHITNEY MADE SOME GOOD POINTS. 
          HAS IT BEEN FACTORED IN YET THAT THERE'S GOING TO BE AN HOA WITHIN THE SUBDIVISION? YES. 
          AND HAS THERE ALREADY BEEN FACTORED IN WHAT THAT HOA THE COST MIGHT POSSIBLY BE WITH WITH REGARDS TO MAYBE WHAT FUTURE COULD BE WITH THE GATED COMMUNITY. SO IT WILL DEFINITELY GO UP. WE'VE NOT FINALIZED THE NUMBERS. WE USUALLY WORK ON THAT AS WE IN THE NEAR OF PHASE ONE CONSTRUCTION. I DID MENTION EARLIER, IN CASE YOU DIDN'T KNOW, WE HAVE NOT FINISHED THE FIRST PHASE AND PLATTED IT YET, IN CASE YOU WERE WONDERING. BUT ONCE WE GET NEAR THAT, USUALLY WHAT TIME WE'RE STARTING TO GET ALL THE QUOTES IN ON THE THE MAINTENANCE AND ALL THE ITEMS AND WORKING UP ALL THE ESCROW ASPECTS OF IT. SO WE DON'T KNOW THAT NUMBER YET, BUT IT WILL DEFINITELY INCREASE. I WOULD THINK IT MIGHT GO AS FAR AS DOUBLE. YEAH, I WOULD, I WOULD SAY SO TOO. THE HOA IS GOING TO SUPPORT THE WHOLE INFRASTRUCTURE OF THAT SUBDIVISION. SO IT WOULD HAVE TO BE. YES. AND THAT WAS CONSIDERED POSSIBLY AS AS A BECAUSE, YOU KNOW, JUST BEING IN THE BUSINESS, PEOPLE ALWAYS ASK, WHAT'S THE HOA? AND IF IT'S SO HIGH OR TOO HIGH, IS THAT A CONSIDERATION? I MEAN, I'M SURE YOU'RE GOING TO COME UP WITH A BALANCE OF WHAT IT IS. IT IS DEFINITELY A FACTOR. 
          THEIR THOUGHTS LOOKING AT IT IS THEY PROBABLY DON'T WANT TO BUILD ALL IN GATED NEIGHBORHOODS, BUT SOME OF THEIR BUYERS WOULD DEFINITELY WANT TO BE IN NEIGHBORHOODS AND IT'S WORTH IT TO THEM. THANK YOU. THANK YOU. ANY OTHER QUESTIONS? I HAVE ONE YES, SIR. 
          ALDERMAN GORDON, DO WE HAVE ANY HISTORY ON THE SAFETY OF GATED SUBDIVISIONS, ON THE SAFETY YOU KNOW, THEN GETTING IN AND OUT OF THOSE SUBDIVISIONS? I DO DEFINITELY NOT HAVE ANY DOCUMENTED HISTORY ON IT. BUT AS FAR AS THE ACCESS, THE ONES THAT I'VE WORKED ON AND THAT 
          [00:40:01]
I'VE BEEN A PART OF HAVE HAD NO ISSUES AS FAR AS LIKE OPERATIONS IN THE RARE CIRCUMSTANCE THAT A STANCE THAT A GATE DOES BREAK, WHICH CAN HAPPEN, ALL YOUR HOAS WOULD HAVE A CONTACT WITH THEIR GATE MAINTENANCE FOLKS THAT CAN ALWAYS JUST MANUALLY OPEN THE GATE SO THAT THEY WOULD AT LEAST BE OPEN DURING THE ENTIRE TIME, BUT THEY WOULD NOT BE CLOSED IN THE EVENING WHILE THE GATES ARE BEING REPAIRED. THAT'S WHAT NORMALLY HAPPENS AT NEIGHBORHOODS. I HEARD A LOT ABOUT THE PROPOSED BY. YOU WOULD LOVE TO SEE THIS. YOU KNOW, PEOPLE MOVING INTO SUBDIVISION. IT'S NICE. I GUESS YOU WANT TO LIVE LIKE THAT. BUT WHAT DOES THIS DO FOR THE PEOPLE, THE SAFETY OF THE PEOPLE HERE AS, AS A AS A HOME BUYER? YEAH, YOU WOULD LIKE THIS, BUT ALL I'M HEARING IS WHAT THE HOME BUYER WANTS, WHAT THE BUYER WANTS. BUT WHAT DOES THE TOWN WANT AS FAR AS PROTECTING THESE PEOPLE? AS FAR AS GETTING THEM IN AND OUT OF SUBDIVISIONS? I SEE SOME NEGATIVE STUFF IN THE BACK. IT SAYS THE PROPOSED CLOSURE WOULD NEGATIVELY IMPACT EMERGENCY RESPONSE AND AND PUBLIC SERVICES. THE REMOVAL OF PUBLIC ACCESS WOULD HAVE A NEGATIVE IMPACT ON VEHICULAR TRAFFIC IN SUBDIVISION. THAT'S THE NEGATIVE SIDE FOR THE TOWN OF LOOKING AT. BUT I HEAR THAT THE BUYERS WOULD LIKE TO SEE THIS BECAUSE IT'S CREATING, I GUESS, A LITTLE SAFETY NET, I GUESS. 
          WHAT DO YOU THINK? SO WHO IS BENEFITING FROM THE HOMEOWNERS WOULD DEFINITELY BE THE BIGGEST BENEFIT. I WOULD SAY THE TOWN ALSO BENEFITS. YOU'RE GOING TO CHARGE THE SAME PROPERTY TAX ON THE HOUSE EITHER WAY, AND NOW YOU'RE NOT REQUIRED TO MANAGE THE STORM DRAINAGE OR THE THE STREETS IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD. AND THEN THE HOMEOWNERS IN EXCHANGE FOR, FOR HAVING THAT PRIVACY TO HAVE THEIR NEIGHBORHOOD GATED AT NIGHT ARE WILLING TO PAY TO REPAVE THE STREETS AND MAINTAIN THE STORM DRAINAGE. THE THE ASPECTS FROM THE EMERGENCY ASPECT. I THINK CHIEF WITT DID A VERY GOOD JOB SAYING THAT FROM A FIRE DEPARTMENT ASPECT, LIKE THEY NEVER WANT A DELAY IN ANY SHAPE, FORM OR FASHION, BUT THEY DO KNOW HOW TO OPERATE WITHIN THESE DELAYS. I THINK THERE'S 6 OR 7 GATED NEIGHBORHOODS IN CORALVILLE, AND MOST OF THEM HAVE BEEN DONE IN THE LAST TEN YEARS, AND THAT THEY OPERATE WELL AND THERE'S BEEN NO ISSUES WITH THEM. BUT OBVIOUSLY ANY ANY EMERGENCY SITUATION, YOU DON'T WANT ANY DELAYS, YOU DON'T WANT TO TRAIN, YOU DON'T WANT TO, YOU KNOW, A STOPLIGHT BLOCKED IN FRONT OF YOU AND YOU DON'T WANT A GATE. BUT WITH THE CLICK CONTROL, I'M CERTAIN THAT THEIR TRAINING AND OPERATIONS, THE WAY I SEE THEM OPERATE, THEY THEY WILL HAVE NO ISSUES DEALING WITH IT. BUT THERE IS A DELAY OF SOME AMOUNT OF SECONDS FOR THAT GATE TO OPEN. SO THE CHIEF CAME CLOSE TO SAYING, WE DON'T WANT THIS. BUT THE STATEMENT. HE SAID THE PROPOSED CLOSURE WILL NEGATIVELY IMPACT EMERGENCY RESPONSE AND OTHER PUBLIC SERVICES. I UNDERSTAND WHERE YOU'RE COMING FROM. HE JUST DON'T WANT TO SAY WE DON'T WANT IT. BUT BUT ACCORDING TO WHAT THIS IS STATING HERE, IT'LL HAVE A NEGATIVE IMPACT, YOU KNOW, ON THE PUBLIC SAFETY. I'VE NEVER KNOWN CHIEF WHITT TO NOT SAY SOMETHING THAT HE WAS THINKING WHY. HE MAY HAVE BEEN STRUCK. TODD JOHNSON LOOKED AT ME BEFORE WE CAME TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION. HE JUST LOOKED AT ME AND SAID, DO NOT DRAG ME INTO THIS ARGUMENT. THAT'S WHAT HE TOLD ME, ALDERMAN MARSHALL. BUT HOMEOWNERS, I MEAN, THAT'S A CHOICE THEY MAKE. RIGHT. AND AND THEY'RE INFORMED, AND I'M SURE AWARE AND UNDERSTAND THAT THAT IS A POSSIBILITY IF THEY CHOOSE TO PURCHASE OR LIVE IN A GATED COMMUNITY, IF IT'S IF IT'S A CHOICE THAT THEY MAKE. SO CORRECT. IT'S, IT'S A WELL KNOWN THING. I'M SURE SOMEBODY IN THE HISTORY OF CARNIVAL HAS BOUGHT IN A GATED COMMUNITY AND NOT PAID ATTENTION AT ALL, BUT IT'S PROBABLY VERY, VERY WELL I'M CERTAIN THAT THE REAL ESTATE AGENTS DO A VERY GOOD JOB OF EXPLAINING IT. MAGNOLIA HOMES USES THEIR OWN IN-HOUSE REAL ESTATE AGENTS DURING THEIR SELLING PROCESS AS WELL, SO THERE'S LESS LIKELY TO BE A AN ISSUE WHEN THE THE ORIGINAL HOME BUYERS BUY THE HOMES, ANY OTHER QUESTIONS? GO AHEAD. SO WHEN THERE ARE EVENTS, LET'S JUST SAY THERE IS EVENTS IN THE PARK AND IT IS OPEN LATER. DID I HEAR YOU SAY YOU ARE WILLING TO WORK WITH THE TOWN TO KEEP THOSE GATES? IF THAT'S SOMETHING YOU ALL WOULD LIKE, WE'RE MORE THAN WILLING TO. WHEN I STARTED AND OPENED, I BASICALLY SAID THAT WE DIDN'T THINK IT WAS NECESSARY, THAT WE WOULD RATHER JUST MAKE IT 6 A.M. TO 8 P.M. BECAUSE THE. THE PEDESTRIAN ACCESS IS THE ONLY THING THAT MATTERS. THE. YOU CAN'T DRIVE TO THE PARK THROUGH THE NEIGHBORHOOD. THERE'S NOT A ROAD THAT CONNECTS TO THE PARK THROUGH THE NEIGHBORHOOD, NOR WILL THERE EVER BE A ROAD THROUGH THE NEIGHBORHOOD THAT GETS TO THE PARK. BUT WE DO HAVE A SIDEWALK CONNECTION, BUT WE ALSO HAVE A SIDEWALK CONNECTION ALL ALONG, FLEMING, THAT WE'RE BUILDING. SO ANYBODY NORTH OF THE NEIGHBORHOOD THAT WANTS TO WALK TO THE PARK CAN WALK RIGHT DOWN THE FLEMING ROAD SIDEWALK. BUT DURING THE NORMAL SIX A M TO EIGHT P M HOURS, THEY WILL BE ABLE TO WALK THROUGH THE NEIGHBORHOOD AS WELL. BUT IF IT'S SOMETHING THAT Y'ALL WANT US TO PROMISE, WE DON'T MIND PROMISING THAT THE GATES WOULD STAY OPEN WITH PARK ACTIVITY. IS THERE ANYTHING WRITTEN FOR A TOWN 
          [00:45:04]
CONCERNED TO STATE THAT THIS DOES NOT COMPLY WITH THE TOWN, OR JUST SAYING IT, JUST BECAUSE THIS IS WHAT THE PEOPLE WANT? ANYTHING WRITTEN ON PAPER, ANYWHERE STATED THIS IS AGAINST THE TOWN ORDINANCE OR ANYTHING. PERSONALLY, I'LL ANSWER THAT QUESTION. THE TOWN LOVES CONNECTIVITY. IF YOU READ ALL THE RULES, THEY JUST LOVE EVERYTHING TO CONNECT EVERYTHING. WE DO IT ON COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENTS. WE DO IT ON PRIVATE DEVELOPMENTS. BUT THERE ARE PROVISIONS TO HAVE THESE GATED COMMUNITIES. I WOULD LET SOMEBODY FROM THE TOWN TECHNICALLY ANSWER THAT QUESTION. I THINK THAT MIGHT BE A QUESTION FOR OUR TOWN ATTORNEY. WHAT'S THE QUESTION? THE QUESTION IS THERE A POLICY? IS THERE ANYTHING WRITTEN ANYWHERE IN THE TOWN RULES AND REGULATIONS TO STATE THAT THIS SHOULD NOT TAKE PLACE? WELL, I THINK MR. MCCARTY JUST TOLD YOU THAT THERE ARE RULES THAT APPLY WHEN THERE ARE GATED COMMUNITIES. SO THEY'RE SO THEY'RE PERMITTED SUBJECT TO THE RULES. THEY'RE NOT FAVORED, BUT THEY ARE PERMITTED. YEAH. AND WHAT I HEARD THEM SAY, THEY ARE MORE THAN WILLING TO COMPLY WITH ALL THE RULES. CORRECT. YEAH. MAY I ASK A QUESTION. AND YOU MENTIONED GERMANTOWN. NOW WE ALL KNOW COLLIERVILLE IS MUCH BETTER THAN GERMANTOWN. AND I AGREE 100%. AND PEOPLE WOULD CHOOSE COLLIERVILLE BECAUSE OF OUR LOWER TAX RATE THAN GERMANTOWN. BUT I HAVE SEEN SOME SIGNS ON FOREST HILL, IRENE AT THE WILDER DEVELOPMENT THAT IT'S BECOMING A GATED. SO IT'S AN EXISTING DEVELOPMENT. IT WAS THE BEST HOME SHOW, BUT THEY'RE PUTTING GATES UP. WHAT OTHER COMMUNITIES ARE OLDFIELD GREEN PHASE ONE AND TWO? IS THAT THE SAME? IS THAT THE SAME AREA? YES, IT'S OLDFIELD GREEN IS THE ONE JUST NORTH OF WINCHESTER ON FOREST HILL. 
          IRENE. OKAY. THE PHASE ONE CONNECTS WEST. PHASE TWO IS CONNECTING DOWN TO WINCHESTER. 
          THERE'S ANOTHER DEVELOPMENT. I DIDN'T DO IT, SO I DON'T REMEMBER THE NAME OF IT. TO THE EAST OF OLDFIELD GREEN THAT IS ALSO GATED. IT WAS DEVELOPED, I WANT TO SAY PLATTED 2006 SEVEN, AND THEN KIND OF GOT STUCK WHEN THE SLOWDOWN HAPPENED. BUT IT'S A GATED COMMUNITY. THERE'S ANOTHER ONE NORTH OF OLDFIELD GREEN THAT'S GATED. THERE'S 2 OR 3, I'D SAY MOST OF THE DEVELOPMENTS THERE ALONG FOREST HILL, IRENE, ARE GATED, THE ONE JUST SOUTH ACROSS THE STREET FROM WILDER THAT BASICALLY MAKES A SQUARE. IT'S GATED, BUT THE NEW ONES THAT THEY'RE ADDING IS MOSTLY WILDER. YES, YES. SO OLDFIELD GREEN WAS THE ONE I WAS INVOLVED WITH THAT WE DESIGNED THAT. WE PLATTED NON-GATED PUBLIC STREETS, AND THEN WE WENT BACK AND CHANGED. 
          JOHN DUKE'S DOING THE SAME THING ON WILDER. I THINK HE MAY HAVE DONE THE SAME THING ON MAPLE GROVE, ON THE NORTH SIDE OF POPLAR. I TRY NOT TO CHEAT TOO MUCH ON CARVEL AND DO TOO MUCH IN GERMANTOWN, BUT FROM MY MEMORY, THAT'S. SO. THIS IS AN AMENDMENT TO THE A RESOLUTION TO AMEND THE PLAN DEVELOPMENT. SO THE THOUGHT PROCESS OF HAVING THIS AS A GATED COMMUNITY DID NOT ENTER INTO THE CONSCIENCE UNTIL PRESENTLY. CORRECT. I WOULD SAY THAT WILDER AND OLDFIELD GREEN IN GERMANTOWN MARKETING TOWARDS THAT. IT'S DEFINITELY SPARKED A LOT OF HOME BUYERS AND A LOT OF. IF YOU SELL NEW HOUSES IN DEVELOPMENT, YOU TRY TO GET AS MUCH FEEDBACK AS YOU CAN AND THAT'S BEEN THE MOST CONSTANT. FEEDBACK IS THEY'RE LOOKING FOR GATED NEIGHBORHOODS. OKAY, MAYOR BOARDS, I WOULD JUST LIKE TO SUGGEST THAT IF THE BOARD IS INCLINED TO GRANT THIS REQUEST, IT'S IMPERATIVE THAT WE ENSURE THAT THE HOA REMAIN INTACT AS IT MIGHT SEEM VERY ATTRACTIVE TO HOME BUYERS AT THIS POINT IN TIME. I THINK WE'RE ALL FAMILIAR WITH A FEW HOMES THAT HAVE DISSOLVED OVER TIME AS COST, YOU KNOW, BECOME A BURDEN TO THAT HOA. AND SO WE WANT TO MAKE SURE THAT THE HOA REMAINS INTACT. AND IF THEY ARE GOING TO TAKE ON THE RESPONSIBILITY OF MAINTAINING THIS INFRASTRUCTURE THAT THEY INTEND TO DO SO IN PERPETUITY. MAYOR. YES. VICE MAYOR, HOW WOULD WE GO ABOUT DOING THAT? HOW WOULD WE GO ABOUT ENSURING THAT AN HOA THAT WOULD REMAIN INTACT? IS THERE SOMETHING WE COULD PUT IN THE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT OF SOME SORT, OR IT WOULD BE THE SIMILAR RULES THAT WE'VE DONE ON THE OTHER GATED COMMUNITIES, LIKE PARK VIEW AND STRATHMORE WERE THE LATEST ONES THAT I WAS INVOLVED WITH IN CARNIVAL. REALLY, THE AMOUNT OF INFRASTRUCTURE THAT ARE IN THE MOST RECENT SUBDIVISIONS ARE NOT SET UP WHERE THE HOA COULD EVER BEGIN TO DISSOLVE BECAUSE OF ALL THE DIFFERENT COMMON OPEN SPACE ENTITIES AND THE MAINTENANCE. IT WOULD IT WOULD UNRAVEL VERY QUICKLY. IF YOU THINK ABOUT A LOT OF THE HEAVIER COMMON OPEN SPACE SUBDIVISIONS, WITH HINT RESERVE BEING ONE OF THEM, IT'S GOT A LOT OF REALLY NICE AMENITIES TO. 
          IT WOULD NOT MAKE IT SIX MONTHS WITHOUT A HIGHLY FUNCTIONING HOA, WITHOUT HAVING A VERY NASTY COMMON OPEN SPACE THAT'S NOT BEEN MOWED. SO I'M NOT SURE THAT I SEE THAT IN IN THE APPLICATION, BUT IT WOULD BE SOMETHING THAT AS A CONDITION THAT IT WOULD WOULD BE, AND WE 
          [00:50:02]
AGREE TO WHATEVER ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS THE TOWN. USUALLY WHEN WE GO THROUGH THE HOA DOCUMENT PROCESS, WE GET THOSE FROM THE DEVELOPER'S ATTORNEY AND SUBMIT THEM TO THE PLANNING STAFF. AND THEN I THINK THEY MAY HAVE NATHAN OR SOMEBODY ELSE READ THOSE AS WELL, AND THEY MARK UP THOSE DOCUMENTS. AND WE ALWAYS THERE'S ALWAYS SOME BACK AND FORTH ON THOSE, JUST LIKE THE CONSTRUCTION PLANS AND THE PLAT. I MEAN, ONE WAY TO DO THAT, MAYOR AND BOARD, WOULD BE TO REQUIRE A BOND FROM THE DEVELOPER TO ENSURE THAT IF THE HOA EVER DID DISSOLVE, THAT THERE WAS SUFFICIENT FUNDING TO FOR THE TOWN TO ASSUME MAINTENANCE OF THAT INFRASTRUCTURE. ALDERMAN ROBBINS, YOU HAVE SOMETHING ON THE TIP OF YOUR TONGUE. I DO I HAVE A QUESTION PROCEDURALLY, WOULD IT BE A APPROPRIATE TIME TO MAKE A MOTION IN ORDER TO OPEN FOR DISCUSSION, TO CONSIDER, IF SO, HOW WE WOULD OR. TO MAKE SURE THAT WE CAN AGREE ON ACHIEVEMENT? WELL, WE DO HAVE BEFORE WE START, IT'S A PUBLIC HEARING. SO I NEED TO CALL FOR THE PUBLIC HEARING FIRST BEFORE WE DO THE MOTION. IS THAT CORRECT, MISS DIAMOND? YES. SO HOLD ON TO THAT. IF YOU WOULD PLEASE. ANY OTHER QUESTIONS FOR THE APPLICANT. 
          ALL RIGHT. THIS IS A PUBLIC HEARING. IS THERE ANYONE IN THE AUDIENCE THAT WOULD LIKE TO COME AND ADDRESS THE BOARD OF MAYOR AND ALDERMEN THIS EVENING? SEEING NONE, THE PUBLIC HEARING IS CLOSED. ALDERMAN ROBBINS, BACK TO YOU. GREAT. CAN WE GET THE PROPOSED MOTION BACK UP? MY COMPUTER WENT DEAD. I'D LIKE TO MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE RESOLUTION 2026 DASH TEN. 
          SECOND. WE HAVE A MOTION AND A SECOND. SO NOW WE HAVE FURTHER DISCUSSION AND WE NEED TO DISCUSS THE HOA INTO. I CAN NEVER SAY THE WORD PERPETUITY. IS THAT SOMETHING THAT WE CAN ADD TO THE CONDITIONS? AND WHAT WOULD THAT LANGUAGE LOOK LIKE? YEAH, I JUST I'D LIKE TO REITERATE WHAT MISS MAYNOR SAID. WE'VE HAD A PROBLEM OVER TIME WITH THESE HOA'S MAINTAINING THEIR CORPORATE FORMALITIES AND GETTING THEIR CHARTERS REVOKED AND BECOMING DEFUNCT. AND THAT MEANS THAT THE TOWN HAS TO ASSUME SOME OF THE RESPONSIBILITIES THAT ARE ORDINARILY PERFORMED BY THE HOA. AND IT'S IT'S ACTUALLY MORE COMMON PROBLEM THAN YOU WOULD IMAGINE, BECAUSE THE MAINTENANCE OF THE CORPORATE CORPORATE FORMALITIES IS, IS ONEROUS. AND IT'S, YOU KNOW, IT'S, IT'S A BURDEN WHICH PEOPLE DON'T FOLLOW THROUGH WITH. SO WHAT I SUGGESTED TO MISS MAYNARD IS THAT WE COME UP WITH SOME WAY THAT REQUIRE THAT THERE BE SOME SURETY PUT IN PLACE IF THE EVENT THERE IS A DEFAULT BY THE HOA, THE TOWN WOULD HAVE THE RESOURCES AVAILABLE TO FULFILL THOSE ROLES. SO EITHER A BOND OR A LETTER OF CREDIT IS WHAT I WOULD. HOW DO YOU DETERMINE THE AMOUNT? BECAUSE IF YOU'RE TALKING INTO PERPETUITY, YOU'VE GOT ROAD, YOU'VE GOT GATE MAINTENANCE, YOU'VE GOT ROAD ASPHALT REPAVING, COMMON OPEN SPACE. I MEAN, WHAT A DOLLAR AMOUNT WOULD PROTECT THE TOWN FOREVER. WELL, THAT'S A GOOD QUESTION BECAUSE OVER, OVER TIME, YOU CAN IMAGINE THERE'LL BE INFLATION AND THE COST WILL EXPLORE. HAVE A QUESTION? I'M FAMILIAR WITH ONE OF THE HOMES THAT HAD GONE DEFUNCT. AND THEN WE WERE OUT MOWING THE MEDIUM. I THINK OVER NEAR I FORGET WHATEVER THE NEGATIVE NEIGHBORHOOD WAS, HOW MANY THAT ARE GATED THAT WE'VE HAD THAT HAPPEN. I MEAN, BECAUSE HOW DO WE MEASURE, LIKE SHE SAID, I MEAN, IF WE'VE HAD A HISTORY OF IT AND AND THAT IS A RISK. HAVE THERE BEEN SOME GATED ONES THAT WENT DEFUNCT IN THEIR HOA AND WE HAD TO GO IN THERE AND ASSUME THOSE RESPONSIBILITIES. I, I CANNOT AT THE TOP OF MY HEAD, THINK OF ANY THAT ARE GATED THAT HAVE GONE DEFUNCT. A LOT OF TIMES WE DON'T WE'RE NOT MADE AWARE OF THE SITUATION UNTIL LONG AFTER THE HOA HAS BEEN DISSOLVED, AND THAT THE COMMON OPEN SPACE AREA ENDS UP IN THE SHELBY COUNTY LAND BANK. AND AND SOMEBODY IN CALIFORNIA BUYS IT, THINKS THEY'RE GETTING A DEAL, AND THE CYCLE REPEATS. AND MEANWHILE, THE PROPERTY IS NOT BEING MAINTAINED. IT BECOMES OURS, OURS TO DEAL WITH. AND SO WE'VE HAD THAT SITUATION HAPPEN WITH COMMON OPEN SPACE AREAS, DETENTION BASINS AND THINGS LIKE THAT. I'M NOT FAMILIAR WITH ANY SITUATION CURRENTLY WHERE IT WOULD INCLUDE PRIVATE STREETS THAT WE'VE HAD TO TAKE OVER. BUT THAT'S NOT TO SAY THAT IT COULDN'T HAPPEN IN THIS SITUATION. AND SO WHILE NEW SUBDIVISION, PROBABLY NOT SOMETHING THAT IS ON THE THE NEAR IN THE NEAR FUTURE, HOWEVER, IN 20 YEARS FROM NOW, WHEN IT BECOMES A BURDEN TO THE 
          [00:55:03]
HOMEOWNERS IN THAT SUBDIVISION, WHEN THE STREETS ARE IN NEED OF RESURFACING OR REPAIR OR WHATNOT, THAT'S WHEN IT TYPICALLY WOULD BECOME AN ISSUE. AND THAT'S WHEN WE WOULD START GETTING PLEAS FOR. WE WANT THE TOWN TO TAKE THE STREETS BACK OVER. IN PREVIOUS COMMUNITIES WHERE I'VE WORKED, WHERE WE'VE BEEN APPROACHED WITH THAT SITUATION, IT HAS BEEN WILL YOU BRING IT UP TO CITY STANDARDS AND THEN WE WILL CONSIDER TAKING IT OVER. BUT AGAIN, IF THE HOA HAS BEEN DISSOLVED AND THERE HASN'T BEEN SUFFICIENT FUNDING SET ASIDE TO ADDRESS THAT, THAT'S WHERE THE RUB COMES IN. AND I AGREE WITH YOU. I'M NOT DISAGREEING WITH YOU. I WAS JUST SAYING, HOW DO YOU SET THAT AMOUNT, LIKE YOU WERE SAYING? BECAUSE IN MY MIND, I WAS I WAS THINKING, YOU KNOW, AS FAR AS LIKE THE STREETS, WHAT IF SOMETHING DID, YOU KNOW, HAPPENED IN THEIR PRIVATE STREETS? BUT I WAS JUST FIGURING, HOW DO WE, HOW DO WE SET THAT AMOUNT? IS THAT SOMETHING WE, YOU KNOW, DO TONIGHT? OR I'M DEFERRING TO Y'ALL'S EXPERTISE ON. I'D RECOMMEND THAT THE ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT LOOK AT THE VALUE OF THAT INFRASTRUCTURE AND TRY TO DETERMINE WHAT THAT WOULD LOOK LIKE WITH INFLATION OVER THE YEARS TO FIND AN APPROPRIATE AMOUNT FOR THAT PROPOSED BOND. I HATE MAKING UP POLICY ON THE FLY, BUT ONE THING YOU COULD DO IS YOU COULD REQUIRE A BOND BE POSTED AND IT HAVE TO BE UPDATED PERIODICALLY AS DETERMINED BY THE THE WHATEVER WE CALL MIKE'S POSITION DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR, COMMUNITY ORCHARD POSITION MIKE AND DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR. AND I CERTAINLY APPRECIATE THE VISION THINKING 20 YEARS DOWN THE ROAD, BECAUSE WE ALL SHOULD DO THAT WHEN WE. DECISIONS. IT'S NOT ABOUT WHAT'S. TODAY, IT'S THE FUTURE. MAYOR, COULD I ADD A YES, A QUESTION AND A COMMENT AS WELL? I MEAN, IN IN MY WORLD OF OPERATION, YOU CAN BUY AN INSURANCE POLICY AGAINST ALL THINGS, BASICALLY. AND THAT'S ESSENTIALLY WHAT A BOND PERFORMS AS. AND IF I'M CORRECT, WE WOULD BE CARRYING THE BURDEN OF ALL OF THIS EXCEPT FOR CUTTING GRASS. AT THIS POINT, SHOULD WE NOT AMEND THE CONTRACT? CORRECT. WE WOULD BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE MAINTENANCE AND UPKEEP OF THOSE STREETS IN PERPETUITY. IF WE MOVE FORWARD, POTENTIALLY TO AMEND THIS, THEN WE'RE NETTING A SAVINGS LONG TERM ONE WAY OR THE OTHER, IN A ROUNDABOUT WAY, MAYBE NOT IN ALL THINGS, BUT ALL THINGS THAT WE WOULD BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ANYWAY, CORRECT? AM I, AM I UNDERSTANDING THIS PROPERLY THAT WE'RE ACTUALLY SAVING MONEY? AND ULTIMATELY ONE DAY THE CONCERNS THAT WE MIGHT HAVE TO SPEND MONEY. BUT THAT IS A WORST CASE SCENARIO. AND WITH AN APPROPRIATE BOND IN PLACE, WE WOULD BE ABLE TO MITIGATE THAT OVER TIME AND NOT ACTUALLY HAVE ANY COSTS IN THE MEANTIME. SURE. AND I THINK THAT'S PART OF THE APPEAL TO IT, IS THAT WE WOULD BE SAVING MONEY IN PLACE OF SPENDING MONEY. AND IF THE WORST CASE OCCURS AND THE APPLICANT WAS IN FAVOR OF A BOND THAT WAS EQUAL TO X AMOUNT OF THE ANNUAL OPERATING COST OR WHATEVER, YOU KNOW, WE CAN ENSURE THAT. SO I, YOU KNOW, I THINK IT'S A PRETTY INTERESTING APPROACH. AND, YOU KNOW, SO JUST THROWING IT OUT THERE. MR. MCCARTY, I CAN TELL THAT Y'ALL ARE HAVING A LOT OF TROUBLE STEWING OVER THIS. A COUPLE DIFFERENT THINGS I COULD OFFER TO MAKE THIS EASY. ONE IS WHATEVER HAS BEEN PUT IN PLACE IN THE OTHER GATED COMMUNITIES. BUT IF IT WOULD MAKE THIS EASIER FOR US TO, TO GET A FEELING THAT WE NEED TO SOLVE THIS PROBLEM AND THEN TABLE IT AND COME BACK WITH SOME APPROPRIATE DOCUMENTATION OF WHAT'S BEEN DOCUMENTED WOULD PROBABLY MAKE IT THE EASIEST. 
          OKAY. WITH THAT BEING SAID, THE MAKER OF THE MOTION WAS THAT. CAN I SAY SOMETHING ELSE BEFORE YOU GO? YES, I HEAR ABOUT PUTTING UP A BOND AND ALL OF THIS. I MEAN, INITIALLY THE TIME WE'LL SAVE MONEY AFTER A PERIOD OF YEARS, THE NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION DISSOLVED. NOW THE TOWN IS SPENDING MONEY. NOW WE'RE LOOKING AT DOWN THE ROAD HERE. 
          WE'RE NOT WE'RE NOT LOOKING AT WE'RE TAKING A GAMBLE. I THINK THAT BY DOING THIS AND I'M READING SOMETHING ELSE HERE, THIS IS STATED ON PAGE 41 OF OUR PACKET DEVELOPMENT SHALL PROVIDE ROADWAYS PERMANENTLY OPEN TO THE PUBLIC THAT PROVIDES COMMUNITY WIDE ACCESS AS PART OF THE OVERALL CONNECTIVITY NETWORK, WHOSE SPACING GENERALLY OCCURS AT ONE FOURTH MILE INTERVAL. THIS IS WRITTEN, I GUESS YEARS BACK, THAT THAT THE TOWN PUT IN PLACE. 
          THIS IS WHAT THEY WANT, YOU KNOW, TO BE NOW. RIGHT NOW WE'RE GOING TO THROW ALL THIS ASIDE. IS THAT CORRECT? SO WHAT WE'RE REQUESTING IS TO CHANGE THE PLAN DEVELOPMENT AS IT WAS APPROVED FROM THE PUBLIC STREETS, TO MIRROR MANY OF THE DEVELOPMENTS IN THE TOWN THAT HAVE BEEN APPROVED. ONE OF THE OLDER DEVELOPMENTS I THOUGHT ABOUT AFTER I SAT DOWN, THE FIRST ONE THAT I REMEMBER, ASHLEY HALL, IS THAT THE ONE JUST EAST OF CARLISLE UNITED METHODIST CHURCH? YEAH, I THINK IT WAS ONE OF THE FIRST GATED ONES DEVELOPED IN THE MID 90S, 
          [01:00:02]
EARLY 90S. AND I WOULD SAY THAT I THINK WE'RE TRYING TO SOLVE A PROBLEM THAT PROBABLY DOESN'T EXIST WITH THE QUALITY OF A GATED NEIGHBORHOOD AND THE HOA BEING SET UP WITH A CHARTER THAT DOES NOT ALLOW IT TO GO DEFUNCT BECAUSE OF ITS RESPONSIBILITIES. I THINK SOME OF THOSE THAT HAVE FOLDED MIGHT HAVE HAD ONE LITTLE GREEN SPACE PARK IN THE CORNER OF THE DEVELOPMENT THAT A HOMEOWNER MAY BE IN MODE, UNLIKE A DEVELOPMENT LIKE PARKVIEW OR DUBRAY OR STRATHMORE THAT HAVE THAT HAVE HAD SOME MAJOR HOA ASSETS. I MEAN, IF YOU THINK ABOUT STRATHMORE, I MEAN, IT'S GOT A COMMUNITY HOUSE AND A POOL. LIKE I DON'T THINK THERE'S ANY RISK. AND I THINK OUR REQUEST TO TABLE IS THAT WE'RE GOING TO GO DIG INTO SOME OF THOSE HOA DOCUMENTS THAT I DON'T PERSONALLY HAVE TO GET AS DEEP INTO AND LOOK AT SOME OF THAT LANGUAGE AND BRING IT BACK TO YOU ALL TO SHOW YOU ALL WHAT WE'VE SEEN, BECAUSE I PROMISE YOU, WE DON'T WANT THAT SITUATION EITHER. IT WOULD NOT LOOK GOOD ON MAGNOLIA HOMES OR ME OR ANYBODY ELSE INVOLVED IN THE PROJECT. I HAVE A DEVELOPMENT THAT IS NOT PAYING ITS BILLS IN THE FUTURE, AND I THINK IF THE TOWN DOESN'T HAVE SOME METHOD OF ALL THESE PRIVATE HOAS, AT LEAST SUBMITTING SOMETHING EVERY OTHER YEAR, JUST SHOWING, HEY, WE'RE WE'RE NOT INSOLVENT. WE'VE GOT SOME CASH ON THE BOOKS. THAT PROBABLY WOULDN'T BE AN IDEA, A BAD IDEA TO JUST HAVE THEM SUBMIT SOMETHING ON A REGULAR BASIS. SO, I MEAN, I GUESS THE ONLY THING I THE PROPERTY TAXES, YOU STILL GOT TO PAY THE PROPERTY TAXES. YES. 
          NO PROBLEM. SO WE'RE TAKING ALL THAT MONEY IN AND PROVIDING THOSE SERVICES. AND THE TAXES WILL PROBABLY BE HIGHER. AND THEN TAXES ARE GOING TO CONTINUE TO INCREASE UNFORTUNATELY. SO WE'RE STILL GOING TO BE TAKING THAT MONEY IN AND NOT SPENDING IT. AND THEN MAYBE, POSSIBLY ONE DAY WE'LL HAVE TO TAKE CARE OF ROADS THAT WE WOULD HAVE HAD TO HAVE TAKEN CARE OF ANYWAYS, AND SEWERS WE WOULD HAVE HAD TO TAKE CARE OF ANYWAYS, AND MAYBE CUT SOME GRASS. OKAY. ALL RIGHT. WELL, I SEE MY EXPERIENCE IN THIS FIELD IS IT'S A WIN WIN, USUALLY ALL THE WAY AROUND FOR EVERYBODY INVOLVED. AND I THINK THAT WITH ALL DUE RESPECT, WITH THINGS GOING DEFUNK, I THINK THAT, LISTEN, MY EXPERIENCE WITH HOMEOWNERS IN THESE SUBDIVISIONS, THEY'RE ON TOP OF THE FINANCIALS AND THEY KNOW WHAT'S GOING ON. AND I DON'T THINK THERE COULD BE ANY SURPRISES GOING ON. I THINK I'VE SEEN WHERE SOME SUBDIVISIONS HAVE IF THERE'S ONE ON JOHNSON ROAD OR SOMETHING THAT WAS NOT GATED AND THEN WENT GATED, AND THEN THEY DECIDED THEY DIDN'T WANT TO GO GATED AND IT WAS JUST. 
          BUT IF YOU START OFF ON THE VERY FRONT WITH THE EXPECTATION THAT THIS IS WHAT IT IS AND THIS IS HOW IT'S GOING TO BE, AND IF IT'S WELL KEPT AND Y'ALL DO GOOD QUALITY JOB DOING THE DEVELOPMENT, YOU HAVE A HISTORY OF, I MEAN, I THINK IT'S A WIN WIN. SO AND TO ALDERMAN HALL'S POINT, YOU'RE RIGHT. I'M TAKING IN THE TAXES ALREADY. SO I COULDN'T IMAGINE IT GOING DEFUNCT. AND I'M NOT SURE WHAT WE HAVE IN PLACE FOR ANY OTHER DEVELOPMENTS. IF Y'ALL WANT TO TAKE THAT TIME TO RESEARCH AND BRING IT BACK TO SOME. I'M ALL FOR THAT. SO ALDERMAN HODGES STATED SOMETHING THAT CLEARED MY MIND. THEY PAY IN PROPERTY TAX AND WE'RE NOT SPENDING ANY MONEY TO TAKE CARE OF THESE STREETS. IS THAT CORRECT? YES, SIR. PRESIDENT. SO THAT MEANS THAT THIS IS MONEY THAT'S BEING BANKED? YES, SIR. SO IF THEY GO TO DEFAULT, WE GOT MONEY IN THE BANK THERE. YOU CAN TAKE CARE OF THESE THINGS. Y'ALL PROBABLY WON'T BANK IT. Y'ALL SPEND IT ON OTHER THINGS IN THE PARK OR SPEND ON PUBLIC. YOU KNOW, THE SQUARE, THE AREA BEHIND TOWN HALL HERE. NOT NOT ALL PROPERTY TAXES END UP REINVESTED RIGHT IN THE DEVELOPMENT, BUT A PORTION OF THEM DO FOR SURE. SO IN THE DOCUMENTS NOW IF THIS WAS APPROVED THIS EVENING, IS THERE LANGUAGE IN THE HOA COVENANTS AND RESTRICTIONS THAT ALLOW IT TO NEVER CEASE OPERATING AS AN HOA? I WISH I COULD ANSWER THAT QUESTION. I'VE NOT READ THOSE DOCUMENTS IN A YEAR SINCE WE WENT THROUGH THE SUBDIVISION PROCESS. I GUESS IT'S BEEN OVER A YEAR. 
          I'M CERTAIN THAT THE WHICHEVER ATTORNEY DOES REVIEW THOSE AND ALWAYS MAKES THE COMMENTS THAT WE ALWAYS SEND BACK OVER TO PLANNING, I'M SURE THAT THEY'VE GOT CERTAIN STATEMENTS IN THERE THAT PROTECT THAT. MAYOR, I BELIEVE THAT IF THE BOARD DOES MOVE FORWARD WITH THIS THIS EVENING, THAT THE NEXT STEP IS AMENDING THE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT. AND SO WE COULD GET INTO THE WEEDS ON THE SPECIFICS OF THIS AT THAT STAGE OF THE APPROVALS, YOU COULD APPROVE IT TONIGHT, CONTINGENT UPON SUCCESSFUL LANGUAGE TO AMEND THE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT. OKAY. 
          WOULD THE MAKER OF THE MOTION TO AMEND THEIR MOTION? YES I WOULD. MAYOR, I'D LIKE TO MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE RESOLUTION 2026 DASH TEN. CONTINGENT UPON THE REVIEW OF THE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT AND AMENDMENT TO INCLUDE LANGUAGE THAT SUPPORTS THE LONG TERM. MAINTENANCE AND SUPPORT OF THE THE GATED COMMUNITY. IS THAT APPROPRIATE? I CAN ADJUST. DOES THAT COVER 
          [01:05:05]
IT? OKAY, COOL. DID YOU GET ALL THAT? DOES THE MAKER OF THE SECOND AGREE WITH THE AMENDED MOTION? SECOND. OKAY, SO WE HAVE A REVISED MOTION AND A SECOND. ANY FURTHER DISCUSSION? SEEING NONE, MISS SIMON, IF YOU'LL CALL THE ROLL, PLEASE. MISS MARSHALL? YES. MR. STAMPS. 
          YES. MR. ROBBINS. YES. MR. HALL. YES. MR. JORDAN. YES. MAYOR FRAZIER. YES, THAT'S BEEN APPROVED. THANK YOU VERY MUCH. MISS MANOR. IS THERE ANY OTHER BUSINESS TO COME BEFORE THE BOARD THIS EVENING? NOTHING
* This transcript was compiled from uncorrected Closed Captioning.