Apr 13, 2026 Board of Mayor and Aldermen

[1 CALL TO ORDER & INVOCATION]

[00:00:07]

ORDER OF THE BOARD OF MAYOR AND ALDERMEN FOR MONDAY, APRIL 13TH, 2026 TO ORDER. AND WE HAVE PASTOR AND CHAPLAIN TERRY HUNT HERE WITH US FOR AN INVOCATION. AND IF ALDERMAN MISSY MARSHALL, IF YOU'LL LEAD US IN THE PLEDGE, PLEASE, PLEASE RISE. HEAVENLY FATHER, WE LOVE YOU TONIGHT.

AND WE COME TOGETHER TONIGHT TO GOD, LIFTING UP EACH LEADERSHIP OF COLLIERVILLE TODAY, LORD, FROM THE MAYOR TO THE BOARD AND ALDERMAN, EVEN DOWN TO THE TOWN ADMINISTRATORS TONIGHT. LORD, WE JUST LIFT ALL OF THEM UP. LORD, WE HAVE PLACED THEM IN POSITIONS AS AS TOWN LEADERSHIP, AND THEY HAVE GREAT INFLUENCE AND RESPONSIBILITY FOR OUR TOWN LORD, AT THIS TIME THAT WE'RE IN. AND GOD, WE GRANT THEM WISDOM. LORD, WE ASK YOU TO GRANT THEM WISDOM BEYOND. LORD, THEIR OWN UNDERSTANDING THAT THEY MAY LEAD WITH DISCERNMENT AND FAIRNESS AND INTEGRITY IN EVERY DECISION THEY FACE. LORD, WE PRAY YOU, GUIDE THEIR HEARTS TO SEEK THE RIGHT, JUST AND BENEFICIAL TO ALL THE PEOPLE OF THE TOWN OF COLLIERVILLE, JESUS. LORD, WE GIVE YOU, LORD, THIS PRAISE TONIGHT FOR LETTING US COME TOGETHER, LORD. AND WE PRAY TONIGHT, LORD, THAT YOU GIVE EACH AND EVERY LEADERSHIP UNITY, LORD, WHERE THEY MAY, MAY BE, DIVISION OR CLARITY, LORD, WHERE THERE MAY BE UNCERTAINTY. LORD, I PRAY YOU GIVE THEM COURAGE, LORD, WHERE THERE MAY BE DIFFICULTY IN CHOICES THAT MUST BE MADE TONIGHT. LORD, WE PRAY, LORD, THAT YOU HELP THEM TO SERVE THEIR PURPOSE IN THIS LIFE, THAT THEY LIVE IN, THIS LEADERSHIP THAT THEY'RE LIVING TONIGHT. JESUS WITH THE GENUINE DESIRE, LORD, TO UPLIFT THEM, PROTECT THE CITIZENS THEY REPRESENT TONIGHT. LORD, I PRAY YOU SURROUND THEM WITH THE WISE COUNSEL, COUNSEL, AND GUARD THEIR DISCOURAGEMENT WITH FROM DISCOURAGEMENT AND FROM PRIDE, LORD, THAT MIGHT COME AGAINST THEM. JESUS, I PRAY YOU PROTECT THEM, LORD, AND STRENGTHEN THEM.

WHEN THE WEIGHT OF LEADERSHIP FEELS SO HEAVY, COME WITH THEM, LORD, AND REMIND THEM THAT THE TRUE LEADERSHIP IS FOUND WITH HUMILITY AND AND WITH SERVICE, LORD, AND WE PRAY. PEACE OVER CARNIVAL TONIGHT, JESUS, THAT IT WOULD BE A PLACE OF SAFETY, GROWTH, AND BLESSINGS. AND LORD, WE PRAY THAT YOU LET YOUR HAND REST UPON EACH AND EACH PERSON IN THIS TOWN, LORD, THAT IT ALL THE LEADERS. GOD THAT THEY MAY WALK IN THE SPIRIT OF RIGHTEOUSNESS AND ACCOUNTABILITY. LORD, WE JUST WE JUST BELIEVE GOD. EVERY PLAN THAT'S VOTED ON TONIGHT WILL BE ALIGNED WITH YOUR PURPOSE AND GOD. THAT YOU MAY LEAD GOD THAT YOUR PURPOSE WITH EVERY ASPECT OF THIS TOWN HAS LINED UP TONIGHT. AND LORD, WE PRAY ALL THIS TONIGHT. IN JESUS NAME WE PRAISE YOU. AMEN. AMEN. I PLEDGE ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AND TO THE REPUBLIC FOR WHICH IT STANDS. ONE NATION UNDER GOD, INDIVISIBLE, WITH LIBERTY AND JUSTICE FOR ALL. THANK YOU SO MUCH, PASTOR. WE APPRECIATE YOU AND WE NEED YOU AND YOUR PRAYERS. MISS DIAMOND, IF YOU CAN CALL THE ROLL, PLEASE. MR. HALL. HERE, MR. JORDAN HERE, MISS MARSHALL HERE, MR. STAMPS. YES, HERE, MR. ROBBINS HERE. OKAY. ALL OF THE BOARD MEMBERS

[4 APPROVAL OF AGENDA (Additions/Deletions)]

[5 APPROVAL OF MINUTES]

BUT PRIOR TO THE DISCUSSION REGARDING THE SITE PLAN FOR MCDONALD'S, IF YOU COULD ADD FOR ME, I HAD ASKED THE QUESTION TO CONFIRM FOR THE PUBLIC'S POINT OF VIEW THAT WE CANNOT. I ASKED THE QUESTION IF THE TOWN CAN REQUIRE THE APPLICANT TO ADDRESS ANY CONCERNS WITH THE VACANT ORIGINAL MCDONALD'S. PRIOR TO APPROVING THIS ADDITIONAL SITE PLAN, MISS MAYNOR SAID NO AND THEN WENT INTO THE WHOLE RESTAURANT SITUATION. SO IF YOU

[00:05:04]

THE NEXT SET OF MINUTES IS THE WORK SESSION FOR MARCH 23RD. I'M SORRY. MARCH 26TH, 2026.

ARE THERE ANY CHANGES OR CORRECTIONS TO THOSE MINUTES? SEEING NONE, IS THERE A MOTION? PLEASE MOVE TO APPROVE THE MINUTES FOR THE MARCH 26TH WORK SESSION. SECOND, WE HAVE A MOTION AND A SECOND. MISS DIAMOND, IF YOU'LL CALL THE ROLL, PLEASE, MR. STAMPS. YES, MR. ROBBINS? YES, MR. HALL. YES, MR. JORDAN? YES, MISS MARSHALL. YES, MAYOR FRASER. YES. THOSE MINUTES HAVE BEEN APPROVED. AND THEN WE HAVE THE LAST SET OF MINUTES FROM THE SPECIAL CALL MEETING ON THURSDAY, APRIL THE 9TH. ARE THERE ANY CHANGES OR CORRECTIONS TO THOSE MINUTES? SEEING NONE, IS THERE A MOTION TO APPROVE THE MINUTES FOR APRIL 9TH MEETING? I HAVE A MOTION. IS THERE A SECOND? SECOND. OKAY, WE HAVE A MOTION AND A SECOND. MISS DIAMOND, IF YOU'LL CALL THE ROLL, PLEASE, MR. ROBBINS. YES, MR. HALL? YES, MR. JORDAN? YES, MISS MARSHALL.

YES, MR. STAMPS? YES, MAYOR FRASER. YES. THOSE MINUTES ARE APPROVED. OKAY. THE NEXT AGENDA ITEM IS A SPECIAL PRESENTATION. DO WE HAVE ANY PRESENTATIONS THIS EVENING, MISS MEENA? NO

[7 CITIZENS COMMENTS]

WE ARE LIVE STREAMED AND THE COMMENTS ARE BEING RECORDED. SO YOU WANT TO SPEAK DIRECTLY INTO THE MICROPHONE, IF YOU WOULD. THE GREEN LIGHT MEANS YOU CAN GO IF YOU WOULD STATE YOUR NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD, WHEN YOU GET TO THE YELLOW LIGHT, YOU HAVE LIKE 30S LEFT TO START WRAPPING UP YOUR COMMENTS. SO WE'RE THANKFUL YOU ARE HERE AND YOU HAVE YOUR THREE MINUTES, PLEASE. THANK YOU. MY NAME IS DAVID YOUNG. I LIVE AT 3300 SOUTH HOUSTON LEVY IN THE FARMS AT BAILEY STATION. AND I WOULD LIKE TO TALK TO YOU ABOUT THE POSSIBILITY OF CHANGING THE SCHEDULE OF LEAF BLOWING AT THE JOHNSON PARK BOARDWALK FROM THREE DAYS A WEEK. MONDAY, WEDNESDAY, FRIDAY TWO. ONE DAY. MAYBE FRIDAY WOULD BE BEST. BUT ANYWAY, IT'S NOISY. IT'S UNNECESSARY IN MY OPINION, AND I BROUGHT A LITTLE SWAG THAT MIGHT PERSUADE YOU OF PICTURES OF OF RESIDENTS OF THE PARK THAT SURELY DON'T LIKE ALL THIS UNNECESSARY NOISE. COULD YOU? WELL THANK YOU, THANK YOU. NOT TO MENTION THE FACT THAT THE PEOPLE IN THE PARK ARE NOT FOND, I'M SURE, OF LEAF BLOWER NOISE. AND HONESTLY, I HAVEN'T DONE A RIGOROUS SURVEY, BUT FROM WHAT I CAN SEE, IT REALLY DOES NOT NEED TO BE DONE. MONDAY. WEDNESDAY. FRIDAY.

THAT'S REALLY ALL I KNOW. IF YOU COULD CONSIDER DOING THAT, I THINK THE ANIMALS WOULD APPRECIATE IT. THE PEOPLE WOULD APPRECIATE IT. AND THE MAN THAT DOES THAT, MAYBE HE COULD FIND SOMETHING ELSE TO DO THAT 30 MINUTES, MONDAYS AND WEDNESDAYS. OKAY, WE WILL TAKE THAT UNDER ADVISEMENT. ALL RIGHT. THANK YOU SO MUCH, MR. YOUNG. THANK YOU. GOOD TO SEE YOU. THE NEXT COMMENT CARD IS FROM BARBARA TOBERMAN, MISS BARBARA. AND I ACTUALLY I HAVE ANOTHER CARD THAT IS FROM MR. ROBERT TOBERMAN AND HE IS DONATING HIS THREE MINUTES TO BARBARA. IS THAT CORRECT? YES, MA'AM. SO YOU HAVE SIX MINUTES IF YOU NEED THEM TO ADDRESS THE BOARD.

IF YOU'LL STATE YOUR NAME AND ADDRESS, PLEASE. OKAY. YES. MY NAME IS BARBARA TOBERMAN. WE LIVE AT 1042 SUGAR LANE HERE IN COLLIERVILLE, TENNESSEE, ON THE WALKING TRAIL. AND I AM HERE TONIGHT TO TELL YOU THAT WE LOVE COLLIERVILLE AND WE APPRECIATE YOUR WONDERFUL LEADERSHIP. I FIRST CAME OUT HERE IN 1986. MY HUSBAND AND I, WE'VE BEEN HERE THROUGH 2004,

[00:10:04]

WE'RE GOING TO DO THIS. WELL, WE WOKE UP LAST WEEK AND IT WAS FINISHED, AND WE HAVE AN ELEVATED WOODEN WALKWAY, WHICH NOW ALLOWS PEOPLE TO LOOK IN OUR YARD, NOT FROM THE NECK UP, FROM THE WAIST UP INTO OUR WHOLE YARD, FROM THE SIDE AND FROM THE BACK. ZERO PRIVACY. I ACTUALLY HAD A LADY STOP THE OTHER DAY, LEAN OVER INTO MY YARD AND SAY, OH, IF SOMEBODY DID THIS TO ME, WE'D BE MOVING. YOUR PROPERTY VALUE JUST WENT DOWN. AND I'M GOING, I MEAN, FROM A STRANGER. AND ON TOP OF THAT SAFETY, IT IS AT A POINT WHERE ANYONE COULD EASILY ACCESS JUMP OVER OUR FENCE AND GET IN OUR BACKYARD. SO WE ARE GOING TO LOOK AT HAVING THE EXPENSE OF HAVING TO PUT MORE SECURITY CAMERAS IN THE BACK, IN ADDITION TO A FENCE, WE HAD HAD SEVERAL ESTIMATES. WE ARE ON A FIXED INCOME, AND I JUST FEEL LIKE DUE TO THE FACT THAT WE WEREN'T. THE WORST PART, I THINK, IS THAT WE ALWAYS FELT LIKE WE WERE GIVEN A HEADS UP FROM OUR THE PEOPLE IN COLLIERVILLE. THIS CAME OUT OF NOWHERE LEFT FIELD. AND I'M LIKE, THIS ISN'T THE BILL I KNOW. YOU KNOW, THE FACT THAT WE'RE LEFT WITH HAVING TO PAY FOR A FENCE THAT'S ONLY TEN YEARS OLD AND IN GREAT SHAPE, AND HAVING TO GO AND PUT A BRAND NEW ONE IN AT OUR EXPENSE, JUST SO I CAN FEEL SAFE AND COMFORTABLE IN MY OWN OUR BACKYARD. SO I'M JUST ASKING AND PRAYING THAT YOU WILL, AGAIN, PLEASE HELP US THROUGH THIS. I THINK THERE'S BEEN SOME WORK DONE IN THAT DIRECTION. I WANT TO TELL YOU, WE LOVE THESE PARKS. WE LOVE THE WAY YOU ALL MAINTAIN YOUR CITY WORKERS COULDN'T BE NICER. AND IT'S REALLY, I HATE TO SAY IT. NOT A COMPLAINT. WE'RE JUST BEGGING FOR SOME HELP HERE BECAUSE I ACTUALLY AM SO UNCOMFORTABLE AND REALLY AFRAID AT THIS POINT, BECAUSE I FEEL LIKE THIS IS JUST ENCOURAGING SOME PROBABLY NOT GOOD BEHAVIOR WHEN YOU CAN JUST GET OVER INTO SOMEBODY'S BACKYARD AND WE PUT OUR PRIVACY FENCE UP. BUT OBVIOUSLY IT'S NOT ENOUGH FOR THIS PROBLEM. SO WE THANK YOU FOR IMPROVING OUR TRAILS. WE BLESS YOU. IT'S A BEAUTIFUL, BEAUTIFUL PROJECT, BUT WE WISH SOMEONE MIGHT HAVE GIVEN US A HEADS UP. AND IF YOU CAN HELP US, WE WOULD APPRECIATE IT. THANK YOU. THANK YOU. AND MR. TOBERMAN, THANK YOU FOR YOUR SERVICE TO OUR COUNTRY. AND WE WILL TALK TOGETHER WITH STAFF REGARDING THE SITUATION. THANK YOU. THE NEXT COMMENT CARD I HAVE IS FROM MR. ROBERT EVANS, MR. EVANS. AND IF YOU WOULD ALSO STATE YOUR NAME AND ADDRESS, PLEASE. GOOD EVENING. THANK YOU. MY NAME IS ROBERT EVANS. I'M HERE ON BEHALF OF BILLY EVANS. HE LIVES AT 1050 SUGAR, NEXT TO BARBARA AND BOB, AND HE'S 93 YEARS OLD. THE DECK THAT HAS BEEN BUILT IS A SAFETY CONCERN ON THERE. THE PRIVACY IS DEFINITELY GONE. THERE IS NO PRIVACY ANYMORE OUT THERE. AND THEY BUILT A HUGE OBSERVATION DECK, SHALL WE CALL IT THAT. KIDS WERE PLAYING ON THIS WEEKEND. IT'S JUST BECOME A PLAY SPOT FOR THEM, GOING UP AND DOWN THE TRAIL ON THERE. IT'S A SAFETY CONCERN. I

[00:15:03]

I CAN JUST SEE A LITTLE KID FLIPPING OVER INTO THE YARD. SO I WISH I WOULD LOOK AT IT AND SEE WHAT CAN BE DONE AND LET US KNOW ON THAT. AND I APPRECIATE EVERYTHING THE TOWN DOES.

THEY'RE THEY'RE A GREAT PLACE TO LIVE. SO THANK YOU, THANK YOU, THANK YOU. WE DEFINITELY WILL LOOK INTO IT. AND IF THERE'S ANYTHING WE CAN DO, WE SURELY WILL DO OUR BEST. THAT IS THE END OF THE COMMENT CARDS THAT I HAVE RECEIVED. DID ANYONE ELSE COME THIS EVENING TO ADDRESS THE BOARD THAT I MAY HAVE OVERLOOKED? OKAY, WE WILL CLOSE THE CITIZEN COMMENT

[8 CONSENT AGENDA]

[9.A Resolution 2026-08 – A Resolution to Amend the FY 2026 General Fund, Capital Investment Program (CIP), and Non-Capital Projects Budgets]

MEMBERS OF THE BOARD. THE ANIMAL SHELTER IS REQUESTING A BUDGET AMENDMENT TO APPROPRIATE $20,000 OF DONATIONS HELD IN THE GENERAL FUND RESTRICTED FUND BALANCE TO COVER THE COST OF MEDICAL SUPPLIES AND VETERINARY CARE. ENGINEERING IS REQUESTING A BUDGET AMENDMENT TO APPROPRIATE $173,000 OF GENERAL FUND UNASSIGNED FUND BALANCE FOR THE HOLMES ROAD BRIDGE PRECAST SLAB OVERLAY NON CAPITAL PROJECT TO COVER THE COST OF THE ACCEPTED BID. THIS WILL BRING THE TOTAL PROJECT BUDGET TO $473,000. ENGINEERING IS ALSO REQUESTING A BUDGET AMENDMENT TO APPROPRIATE $80,000 OF THE CDBG GRANT FOR THE WEST STREET WATER SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS. CIP PROJECT TO COVER THE COST OF THE ACCEPTED BID. THIS WILL BRING THE TOTAL PROJECT BUDGET TO $325,000. IF THE AMENDMENTS ARE APPROVED, FINANCE DEPARTMENT IS REQUESTING A BUDGET AMENDMENT TO APPROPRIATE AND REFLECT THE ADDITIONAL $80,000 IN THE CIP AND $173,000 IN NON-CAPITAL PROJECTS. STAFF IS ON HAND TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS AND A SAMPLE MOTION IS PROVIDED ON THE SCREEN. THANK YOU. JP, ARE THERE ANY QUESTIONS FOR STAFF? I HAVE ONE, ALDERMAN JORDAN CONCERNED. IT'S I HEARD YOU MENTION ABOUT HOLMES ROAD BRIDGE. I HEARD SOMEBODY ASKED ME ABOUT THAT BRIDGE. WHAT'S THE TIMELINE ON THAT? DO YOU KNOW OR I WOULD HAVE TO DEFER TO ENGINEERING ON THAT. MR. PERRIMAN, DO YOU HAVE A TIMELINE ON HOLMES ROAD BRIDGE, PLEASE? YEAH. AT OUR NEXT MEETING, WE PLAN ON BRINGING A CONTRACT FOR THE CONSTRUCTION. WHEN WE MET WITH THEM WHEN WE GOT PRE-BID, IT'S GOING TO TAKE PROBABLY 60 DAYS TO GET THE SLABS. AND THEN AFTER THAT WE'LL GIVE THEM 60 DAYS. SO HOPEFULLY BY THE END OF THIS MONTH, YOU CAN SAY PROBABLY ABOUT 120 DAYS TO TO GET THAT, GET IT OPENED. OKAY. THANK YOU, THANK YOU. ANY OTHER QUESTIONS? DO WE HAVE A MOTION? WE NEED A MOTION. CAN WE HAVE A MOTION TO APPROVE PLEASE? OH, SORRY. GO AHEAD. WE DO HAVE A MOTION. NO, WE NEED A MOTION. WE NEED A MOTION TO APPROVE. MOTION TO APPROVE. IS THERE A SECOND? SECOND, THERE IS A MOTION AND A SECOND. MISS DIAMOND, IF YOU'LL CALL THE ROLL, PLEASE, MR. JORDAN. YES, MISS MARSHALL? YES, MR. STAMPS? YES, MR. ROBBINS. YES, MR. HALL. YES, MAYOR FRASER. YES. THE BUDGET AMENDMENT HAS BEEN APPROVED. THANK YOU. OKAY. WE'LL MOVE ON

[10.A Ordinance 2026-01 - Second Reading and Public Hearing - An Ordinance to Amend Title XV, Chapter 151, of the Town of Collierville Code of Ordinances by Amending §151.003 Definitions; §151.006(C) Fences, Walls and Hedges; §151.008 Traffic Impact Analysis; §151.021 Uses Permitted in Each Zoning District; §151.024 Specific Provisions for Conditional Uses; §151.025 Accessory Uses Permitted in Each Zoning District; §151.026 Temporary Uses, Activities, and Structures; §151.027(D) Site Development Standards for Traditional Zoning Districts; §151.049(A) TN: Traditional Neighborhood District; §151.050(A) MU: Mixed Use District; §151.115 Accessory Off-Street Parking Regulations; §151.116 Accessory Off- Street Loading Regulations; §151.160 Procedures for Planned Development Approval; §151.190 Exterior Lighting; §151.210 Single Family Design Standards; §§151.248 - 151.249 Design Review Commission; §151.268 Tree Planting Specifications; §151.308 Board of Zoning Appeals; §151.310 Conditional Use Permits; §151.311 Site Plan Review; §151.312 Amendments; §151.313 Vesting; and §151.314 Public Notice, Related to a Variety of Development Standards and Processes]

[00:20:08]

[00:25:04]

SO THAT'S A GUARANTEED DELAY FOR THE PROJECT. SO WE'RE TRYING TO MAKE SURE WE HAVE A THOROUGH DISCUSSION ABOUT TRAFFIC. AND THEN WE SEE THE CONSTRUCTION DRAWINGS. SO MOVING ON THE NEXT THING EMERGING TRENDS, VARIOUS THINGS HAPPEN WITH THE BUILT ENVIRONMENT. AND SOLAR IS ONE OF THOSE. SO WE'VE TRIED TO ADD TO THE CODE. A COUPLE OF COUPLE OF THINGS ABOUT SOLAR. ONE HAS TO DO WITH UTILITY SCALE SOLAR AND REGULATIONS THAT WOULD APPLY TO THAT, MAKING SURE THAT WE KNOW WHERE THAT CAN HAPPEN. AND ALSO ON A SMALLER SCALE, THAT MIGHT BE MAYBE AT A RETAIL BUSINESS OR AN OFFICE BUILDING AND HOW THAT WOULD BE REGULATED.

RELATED TO THAT, WE DID TALK WITH MLG AND W ABOUT UTILITY SCALE SOLAR, AND THAT DID CAUSE US TO, TO WANT TO ADD SOME OF THESE THINGS INTO OUR CODE. THEY'VE TOLD US THAT THEY ARE NOT PURSUING UTILITY SCALE SOLAR AT WINCHESTER AT THEIR WINCHESTER SUBSTATION ANYMORE, BUT EVEN THOUGH THEY'RE NOT, YOU'LL STILL HAVE THIS IN YOUR CODE IN CASE THEY CHANGE THEIR MIND OR THEY WANT TO GO TO A DIFFERENT SITE, A DIFFERENT USER COMES ALONG. SO YOU'LL HAVE THESE TOOLS. EMERGING TRENDS ALSO INVOLVE LIKE EV STATIONS, ELECTRIC CHARGING STATIONS. OUR CODE DOESN'T ADDRESS THAT VERY WELL RIGHT NOW. SO WE'RE TRYING TO ADDRESS THAT AND FOOD TRUCKS. AND THAT'S SOMETHING THAT OUR OUR TOWN CODE DOESN'T REALLY ADDRESS EITHER. SO WE'RE GOING TO CHANGE THE TOWN CODE AND HAVE REFERENCES IN THE ZONING ORDINANCE THAT WOULD POINT TO THAT. AND THAT'LL BE ONE OF THE CHANGES THAT WILL COME TO YOU IN A COUPLE OF COUPLE OF MONTHS ABOUT WILL BE FOOD TRUCKS. ALSO, ANOTHER THEME IS ENFORCEMENT AND CONSISTENCY IN TRYING TO IMPROVE THAT. ONE COMPLAINT THAT WE OFTEN HEAR, AND ONE OF THE CHALLENGES OUR CODES DEPARTMENT FACES HAS TO DO WITH VEHICLES PARKED MAYBE IN A FRONT YARD. AND WE HAVE RULES THAT SAY YOU HAVE TO PUT YOUR BOAT OR YOUR RV TO THE SIDE AND REAR OF YOUR HOUSE, BUT OFTEN TRAILERS OR ATVS, THEY'RE VERY VARIOUS OTHER THINGS THAT ARE LIKE RVS AND BOATS THAT AREN'T CLEARLY REGULATED. SO WE'RE TRYING TO BE VERY CLEAR AND INTENTIONAL THAT ALL SUCH THINGS NEED TO BE TO THE SIDE AND REAR OF THE HOME. AND THAT WOULD INCLUDE LIKE MAYBE HOME BASED BUSINESSES THAT MAYBE SOMEBODY HAS A LAWN EQUIPMENT TRUCK THAT'S 20FT LONG AND THEY PARK IT IN THEIR FRONT YARD. THEY'RE GOING TO HAVE TO PUT THAT TO THE SIDE AND REAR OF THEIR HOME AS WELL. AND THIS WILL ENABLE CODES TO BE ABLE TO BETTER RESPOND TO THOSE REGULATIONS. AND WE'RE ALSO GOING TO WORK WITH POLICE AND COURTS ON LANGUAGE FOR THE RIGHT OF WAY, THAT SOMETIMES THOSE THINGS HAPPEN IN THE RIGHT OF WAY AS WELL. AND SO THAT'LL BE ANOTHER SET OF TOWN CODE CHANGES WHERE WE'RE TRYING TO MIRROR THIS LANGUAGE. BUT AS IT RELATES TO THE PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY AND IN THE PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY, POLICE WILL ENFORCE THAT. AND ON THE PRIVATE PROPERTY DEVELOPMENT WILL ENFORCE THAT PULL PERMITS THAT THAT WAS SOMETHING THAT WAS BROUGHT UP AT THE PLANNING COMMISSION, AND WE MADE A CHANGE BETWEEN FIRST AND OR THE PLANNING COMMISSION HEARING AND THE FIRST READING. WE ALREADY REQUIRE POOL PERMITS, BUT WHEN SOMEBODY APPLIES FOR A POOL PERMIT, THEY DON'T HAVE TO PROVIDE AN ENGINEERED DRAWING. AND WE'VE ALL HEARD COMPLAINTS ABOUT DRAINAGE IMPACTS FROM POOLS. AND SO WE'RE TRYING TO ELEVATE THE PROFESSIONALISM OF THAT PERMIT PROCESS. AND SO THERE WOULD BE A REQUIREMENT FOR A DESIGN PROFESSIONAL TO PROVIDE A DRAWING. SO IT COULD BE AN ENGINEER OR SURVEYOR, LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT, BUT SPECIFICALLY LOOKING AT ISSUES LIKE DRAINAGE, WE'RE NOT TAKING ON ANY ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS, MAKING NEW RULES ABOUT DRAINAGE. THEY'RE ALREADY STATE LAWS THAT SAY YOU SHOULDN'T PUSH MORE WATER ONTO YOUR NEIGHBOR. BUT THROUGH THIS PROCESS, WE'LL MAKE SURE THAT DRAINAGE IS EVALUATED BY WHOEVER'S PUTTING IN THE POOL. AND THEY'LL ALSO HAVE TO SIGN A DISCLOSURE FORM

[00:30:04]

FOR A GARAGE, WHEN IT'S 20, THE GARAGE MAY BE 20FT WIDE AND THERE'S A THERE WILL BE A CHANGE THERE. SO FOR CONSISTENCY PURPOSES TO ALLOW A WIDER DRIVEWAY IN THE DOWNTOWN AREA. ANOTHER THEME IS THE BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS. SOMETIMES WE'LL WATCH CASES THAT COME BEFORE THE BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS, AND IT CAN BE A SIGN IF YOU SEE A LOT OF CASES ABOUT ONE PARTICULAR TOPIC, THAT'S A SIGN THAT THE CODE NEEDS TO CHANGE. WE SEE A LOT OF FENCE REQUESTS FOR CORNER LOTS FOR SMALL LOTS, AND PARTICULARLY THE ISSUE IS SOMETIMES OUR RULES SAY THE HOUSE CAN BE CLOSER TO THE PROPERTY LINE OR TO THE ROAD, THAN THE FENCE CAN BE ON A CORNER LOT. AND WE'RE TRYING TO ACKNOWLEDGE THAT IN A SMALL LOT NEIGHBORHOOD LIKE THE VILLAGES OF STRATHMORE OR CHADWICK, THAT IF THE HOUSE CAN BE REALLY CLOSE TO THE STREET, THE THE REAR YARD FENCE CAN BE EQUAL TO THE REAR YARD OF THE THE REAR REAR CORNER OF THE HOUSE. AND SO THAT THAT'S EFFECTIVELY THAT CHANGE. AND ANOTHER CHANGE RELATES TO ACCESSORY STRUCTURES. SO LIKE SHEDS, DETACHED GARAGES, A SIMILAR ISSUE AS WE'VE NOTICED THAT OUR RULES WILL SAY THAT YOU CAN PUT A HOUSE, A 35 FOOT TALL HOUSE TEN FEET FROM THE PROPERTY LINE, BUT A GARAGE THAT'S ONLY 16FT TALL HAS TO BE 16FT OFF THE PROPERTY LINE. SO THIS CHANGE WILL SAY THAT IF IF THE HOUSE CAN BE AT A CERTAIN SETBACK, SO COULD THE ACCESSORY STRUCTURE. IT COULDN'T BE ANY CLOSER. BUT ACKNOWLEDGING THAT THAT SAME RULE, THAT SAME PLANE COULD BE BUILT UPON, AND THEN FINALLY, THERE WOULD BE SOME BETTER IMPLEMENTATION OF THE OF THE LAND USE PLAN. RIGHT NOW, OUR MIXED USE ZONING DISTRICT AND TRADITIONAL NEIGHBORHOOD ZONING DISTRICT ARE ONLY ELIGIBLE FOR USE IN THE DOWNTOWN AREA. AND THIS WOULD SAY THAT THEY COULD BE USED OUTSIDE OF THE DOWNTOWN AREA WHERE THE 2040 PLAN OR EVENTUALLY THE 2050 PLAN SAYS THAT TRADITIONAL NEIGHBORHOOD PLACE TYPES OR MIXED USE PLACE TYPES ARE WHAT ENVISIONED. AND SO THAT COULD HELP ALLOW FOR SOME SOME TRADITIONAL DEVELOPMENT FORMS WITHOUT THE NEED FOR A PLAN DEVELOPMENT. WE HAVE HAD ZERO PLAN DEVELOPMENTS IN THE DOWNTOWN AREA SINCE THE STANDARDS HAVE BEEN ADOPTED, AND THEY'VE BEEN ABLE TO DO PRETTY CONTEXTUAL INFILL. AND SO WE'RE HOPING TO BE ABLE TO DO THAT OUTSIDE OF THE DOWNTOWN AREA. SO IN SUMMARY, THIRD AND FINAL READING WOULD BE NEXT. AT YOUR NEXT MEETING. THAT WOULD BE THE EFFECTIVE DATE. WE'LL PUT SOME NEW FORMS AND CHECKLISTS ON THE THE WEBSITE RELATED TO POOLS AND NEIGHBORHOOD MEETINGS. AND THE STAFF DOES RECOMMEND APPROVAL.

AND THERE'S AN EXAMPLE MOTION ON YOUR YOUR SCREEN TO APPROVE THE THE ORDINANCE ON SECOND READING. THANK YOU. MR. ROSE. JUST ONE QUICK QUESTION FOR ME. ADDING NEIGHBORHOOD MEETINGS TO SEVERAL OF THE CATEGORIES, ACTUALLY, WHAT KIND OF TIME FRAME IS THAT GOING TO ADD ON AN APPROVAL PROCESS? BECAUSE WE HEAR, YOU KNOW, WE WANT TO BE BUSINESS FRIENDLY AND WE WANT TO ACCOMMODATE AS MANY APPLICANTS AS WE CAN. BUT IF YOU'RE ADDING ANOTHER A NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING, WILL THAT DELAY AN APPLICANT A MONTH, TWO MONTHS GETTING THROUGH THE PROCESS ON THAT CHECKLIST? HOW WILL THAT LOOK? WE'RE GOING TO MODEL OUR THE PLAN DEVELOPMENT PROCESS REQUIRES THE NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING AFTER AN APPLICANT APPLIES, BUT BEFORE THE APPLICATION GOES TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION. SO IT REALLY DOESN'T ADD MORE TIME.

IT'S JUST MORE THINGS THAT HAPPEN AFTER THE FORMAL APPLICATION IS MADE. SO THAT WILL HAPPEN WITH THE REZONING AND THE CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT. THEY'LL BE EXPECTED BEFORE AFTER THEY APPLY, BUT BEFORE THEY GO TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION TO HAVE A NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING. SO IT SHOULD NOT ADD TIME. AND OUR ORDINANCE ALREADY ALLOWS FOR A VIRTUAL MEETING. AND SO IF FOLKS ARE WORRIED ABOUT RENTING SPACES AND A LOT OF EXTRA OVERHEAD, IT IS POSSIBLE TO HAVE LIKE A ZOOM NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING IF THEY CONDUCT IT PROPERLY. AND HOPEFULLY THAT WON'T SLOW THEM DOWN TOO MUCH. OKAY. THANK YOU. ARE THERE ANY QUESTIONS FOR STAFF? YEAH. ALDERMAN JORDAN, I JUST WANT TO HEAR THIS CLARITY. YOU STATED SOMETHING ABOUT TRAFFIC STUDY DONE BEFORE THE APPLICATION IS SUBMITTED. CORRECT. WHY WOULD YOU DO THAT? TRAFFIC STUDIES. IT TAKES A WHILE TO PRODUCE THOSE. THERE'S WHAT WE CALL A TRAFFIC METHODOLOGY MEETING WHERE OUR NEED TO OUR TRAFFIC ENGINEER WILL MEET WITH THEIR TRAFFIC ENGINEER AND TALK ABOUT THE ASSUMPTIONS, WHAT WHAT AREAS NEED TO BE STUDIED. AND SO THERE NEEDS TO BE A CONVERSATION. SOMEONE CAN'T SUBMIT A TRAFFIC STUDY COLD BECAUSE IT PROBABLY WON'T REFLECT THE, THE TRAFFIC AND THE, AND THE, THE INTERSECTIONS THAT WE NEED TO BE THAT NEED TO BE STUDIED. SO IT REFERENCES OR IT, IT ACKNOWLEDGES THAT THOSE CONVERSATIONS NEED TO HAPPEN WELL BEFORE THE APPLICATION IS MADE. AND IT ALSO ACKNOWLEDGES

[00:35:02]

AND SO IT WOULD ADD, IT WOULD ADD SOME MORE TIME. THEY'D HAVE TO PLAN AHEAD. IF THEY'RE SHOOTING FOR A CERTAIN DEVELOPMENT CYCLE, THEY WOULD HAVE TO WORK WITH US SOONER.

BUT THEY'RE ALREADY HAVING TO DO A TRAFFIC STUDY. OKAY. ANY QUESTIONS FOR STAFF? ASK A QUESTION FROM THE BOARD. WOULD YOU DO ME A FAVOR? IT IS A SECOND READING AND PUBLIC HEARING. WOULD YOU MIND FILLING OUT ANOTHER CARD, MR. YOUNG? NO, NO, YOU WOULDN'T MIND. ARE YOU SAYING NO? YOU DON'T WANT TO? IF YOU DON'T MIND. AND THEN I WILL CALL YOU UP, I PROMISE.

OKAY. BECAUSE I DO HAVE SEVERAL CITIZEN COMMENT CARDS ON THIS SPECIFIC TOPIC. THANK YOU, THANK YOU. ANY OTHER QUESTIONS FOR STAFF? OKAY. THIS IS IF WE CAN, WE'LL GO TO THE CITIZEN COMMENTS. NOW IT IS A SECOND READING AND PUBLIC HEARING. AND I HAVE SEVERAL CARDS, ACTUALLY HAVE FOUR CARDS. AND I WILL CALL THE FIRST WITH STEWART SMITH AND STEWART SMITH. IT SAYS HERE YOU WISH TO DONATE YOUR TIME TO STEPHEN WILLIAMS. IS THAT CORRECT? CORRECT. OKAY.

THE NEXT CARD I HAVE IS BOBBY WILLIAMS. AND MR. WILLIAMS, YOU'RE WISHING TO DONATE TO STEPHEN, IS THAT CORRECT? AND THE NEXT CARD IS TERRY DEAN ALSO DONATING TO STEPHEN WILLIAMS. AND THEN THE LAST CARD IS STEPHEN WILLIAMS. SO, MR. WILLIAMS, IF YOU COULD COME TO THE FRONT AND STATE YOUR NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD, YOU HAVE FOUR CARDS, WHICH WOULD BE 12 MINUTES, BUT OUR MAXIMUM IS TEN MINUTES. SO YOU HAVE TEN MINUTES TO ADDRESS US.

AND WELCOME. THANK YOU. BOARD. STEPHEN WILLIAMS 185 VALLEY VIEW COVE HERE IN COLLIERVILLE.

AND I'M COMING TONIGHT. I WANT TO TALK A LITTLE BIT ABOUT WHAT I DO FOR THE PEOPLE BEHIND ME THAT DON'T KNOW ME. I'M STEPHEN, YOUR NEIGHBOR, BUT I'M ALSO STEPHEN, THE DEVELOPER I WORK IN, EMPLOYED BY JASON CRUZ WITH CRUZ DEVELOPMENT. WE DO QUITE A BIT OF THINGS IN TOWN. THE BOARD IS PROBABLY WONDERING WHY THEY CAN'T SAY ANYTHING TO ME TONIGHT, BUT I CAN SAY EVERYTHING TO THEM. SO IT'S A DIFFERENT, DIFFERENT ATMOSPHERE TONIGHT. BUT I'M ALSO STEPHEN ON THE BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS. I WAS FORTUNATE ENOUGH TO BE APPOINTED TO THAT THIS YEAR AND SOME OF THE CODE CHANGES. I'M THANKFUL THAT JAMIE AND STAFF ARE IN TUNE WITH WHAT NEEDS TO CHANGE IN OUR CODE. ALSO, STEPHEN, THAT'S PART OF THE STEERING COMMITTEE FOR THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN FOR 2050. WHAT DO WE WANT OUR TOWN TO LOOK LIKE? Y'ALL PUT ABOUT 20 CITIZENS, 19 AND MYSELF TO SAY, WHAT DO WE THINK THIS THING'S GOING TO LOOK LIKE IN A FEW YEARS? AND SOME OF THE FOLKS THAT DONATED, STUART SMITH, I'D LIKE TO GIVE HIM RECOGNITION.

ALSO ON THE STEERING COMMITTEE, STUART SMITH CONSTRUCTION AND INVESTMENT COMPANY IN IN CITIZEN CARVILLE, TERRY DEAN, WHO IS ALSO JUST MISS CARVILLE, ANYTHING GAZEBO OR GAZEBO ADJACENT, I'D LIKE TO SAY TERRY IS INVOLVED IN. AND THEN BOBBY IS ACTUALLY MY FATHER WHO LIVES ABOUT 200 YARDS FROM ME AS THE CROW FLIES. AND I GREW UP, AND I'M THANKFUL THAT HE MOVED HERE SO MANY YEARS AGO SO THAT I COULD GROW UP. AND THEN FULL CIRCLE, HERE I AM. I ALSO ALSO GOT SUSAN EWING, WHO'S A PART OF THE STEERING COMMITTEE. AND SO YOU ASKED ME, WHY ARE YOU STANDING UP HERE, STEPHEN? WELL, LOOKING AT THESE SUBDIVISION ZONING REGULATION CHANGES, EXCUSE ME, THE 90% OF THEM, I WOULD AGREE, ARE GREAT. A LONG TIME COMING FOR SOME OF THE PARKING STUFF THAT JAMIE BROUGHT UP. LOADING BERTHS. ANYBODY HERE KNOW WHAT A LOADING BERTH IS? IT'S GREAT. BUT WE'RE GOING TO REVISE IT WITH THIS TONIGHT. SOLAR PANEL.

I MEAN I COULD GO ON ON ALL THE THINGS, BUT THERE ARE THREE THAT DO CONCERN ME AND I DON'T THINK THEIR INTENT IS ILL BY ANY MEANS. OR ELSE JAMIE AND MIKE AND MOLLY, YOU ALL WOULDN'T HAVE BROUGHT IT BEFORE US. BUT I DO THINK THAT THERE ARE SOME REPERCUSSIONS FROM A DEVELOPMENT STANDPOINT WHERE, YES, OUR TOWN DOESN'T NEED TO JUST SHOE IN DEVELOPERS, BUT THERE ARE THINGS THAT THE GENERAL PUBLIC AND MAYBE EVEN YOURSELVES DON'T THINK ABOUT WITH TIME AND MONEY. SO I WANTED TO TALK ABOUT THOSE THREE IN THE ORDER OF SEVERITY THAT I SEE THEM. THE FIRST IS THE CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT PROCESS, WHERE WE SAY ANYTHING WITH A DRIVE THROUGH. LET'S PUT A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO IT, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT PROCESS.

AND Y'ALL CAN CORRECT ME IF I'M WRONG, BUT I BELIEVE IT'S 90 DAYS. IT'S ANOTHER APPLICATION FEE. AND THEN WE'RE REQUIRING A TRAFFIC STUDY, WHICH TRAFFIC STUDIES TO US ARE NO NEW NEWS.

CUP PROCESSES ARE NO NEW NEWS. BUT IF I HAVE A SITE THAT'S GOT A BANK OF AMERICA ON IT, WELL,

[00:40:04]

BUT TO GIVE THAT BALANCE TO ELECTED OFFICIALS WHO, AGAIN, I DON'T KNOW WHERE WE'LL ALL BE IN A FEW YEARS, IT COULD TIP ONE WAY OR ANOTHER, BUT I WOULD JUST CAUTION THAT IF WE GIVE THAT MUCH DISCRETION TO A BOARD AND IT GOES THROUGH A LONG PROCESS AND WE SPEND ALL THIS MONEY JUST TO GET THERE, AND SOMEONE ON THE BOARD OR MANY PEOPLE, I DON'T KNOW HOW THEY INFLUENCE WORKS, NOT AGREE. WELL, I'VE WASTED ALL OF THAT MONEY. AND THAT JUST SENDS THE MESSAGE TO THE DEVELOPING WORLD. JAVA IS NOT THE PLACE AND WE DO WANT TO TAILOR DEVELOPMENT. SO I BRING ALL THAT IN. YOU TALKED ABOUT THE STEERING COMMITTEE A BUNCH. WELL WHAT'S THE SOLUTION? AND I THINK A GOOD SOLUTION TO THIS IS TRUSTING THAT THE CITIZENS YOU'VE PUT ON THIS COMPREHENSIVE PLAN KNOW HOW TO POINT TO CHARACTER IN THIS TOWN. WHAT DO WE WANT THIS TOWN TO LOOK LIKE? THIS COMP PLAN IS SUCH A MASTER THING THAT DEVELOPERS FROM OUT OF TOWN, THEY FIND A PIECE OF PROPERTY, I THINK. I THINK THAT MIGHT BE GOOD TO PUT A YOU NAME IT ON IT AND THEY LOOK AT THE COMP PLAN AND IT DOESN'T MATCH. THEY WANT YOU KNOW, WE'VE GOT ZEN GARDEN OR SOMETHING. OH I CAN'T PUT THAT THERE. SO THE COMP PLAN IS NOT REGULATION. BUT AT THE END OF THIS COMP PLAN, IT WAS ANNOUNCED TO US THAT THE REGULATIONS WILL BE REDONE SO THAT THOSE TWO DOCUMENTS, IN A UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE AND A COMP PLAN CAN WORK TOGETHER TO HYPER FOCUS ON SOME OF THE CONCERNS THAT WE HAVE WITH THIS REGULATION CHANGE IN SUPPORT OF THE 2050 PLAN. AND I KNOW THE 2040 PLAN IS IN PLACE NOW, AND WE'VE GOT TO KEEP THAT ON THE

[00:45:06]

THAT'S IT. THANK YOU, MR. WILLIAMS. WE APPRECIATE YOU AND VOLUNTEERING FOR THE TOWN. MR. GROSS, QUESTION FOR YOU. WOULD YOU REVIEW THE THREE ITEMS THAT MR. WILLIAMS IS SUGGESTING THAT WE DEFER? AND THEN YOUR OPINION ON HIS RECOMMENDATION? IF YOU TURN IN YOUR HYMNAL TO EXHIBIT FOUR. EXHIBIT FOUR, PAGE ONE. SO EXHIBIT SECTION THREE. THAT HAS TO DO WITH THE TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS. CHANGES, WHICH IT'S REALLY ABOUT THE THE PROCESS THAT WE TALKED ABOUT TO SUBMIT 30 DAYS IN ADVANCE. THE FINAL STUDY. I THINK THAT'S REALLY THE ONLY CHANGE THAT'S HAPPENING TO THAT, THAT PARTICULAR SECTION. NOW, WHAT PAGE DID YOU SAY YOU REFERRED TO ON THAT? IT'S PAGE ONE OF THE EXHIBIT FOUR. DO YOU HAVE EXHIBIT FOUR, PAGE ONE. AND THEN THE ACTUAL CHANGES THAT ARE BEING SUGGESTED ARE ARE ON PAGE SIX, SIX OF 43. OKAY. FOR THAT ONE PAGE. RIGHT HERE. SO THESE SECTIONS. OKAY. AND THEN YOU HAD SECTION 18. THEN SECTION 18 CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS. CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS. AND THAT'S WAY IN THE BACK. STARTS ON PAGE 3435. THAT DOES HAVE. SOME INFORMATION ABOUT. TALKS ABOUT THE NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING PROCESS. PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCES ARE REQUIRED. ALTERNATIVE EQUIVALENT COMPLIANCE. I'LL RESPECTFULLY SAY THAT IF HIS INTENT IS TO STOP CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS FOR RESTAURANTS AND THINGS, THAT IS NOT THE SECTION TO DELETE. AND THEN. JIMMY, COULD YOU SAY THAT ONE MORE TIME? IF HIS INTENT IS WHAT IF HIS INTENT IS TO NOT REQUIRE A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR RESTAURANTS AND DRIVE OTHER DRIVE THROUGH USES THAT WOULD NOT THAT THAT'S MORE OF A GENERAL SECTION THAT APPLIES TO CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS. AND IF THAT IS HIS CONCERN, THERE'S ANOTHER SECTION THE CHANGES TO THE TABLE. THERE'S TWO OTHER SECTIONS THAT WOULD NEED TO BE ALTERED IF IF THAT IF Y'ALL ARE SYMPATHETIC TO THAT, THAT CONCERN, IT'S LIKE EXHIBIT F, WHICH IS ON PAGE 13. NO, NO, I'LL HAVE TO BACK UP A SECOND.

HE REFERENCED THE WORD BLANKET, BLANKET, EVERYTHING WITH THAT. HOW DID YOU REACT TO THAT DESCRIPTION OF A BLANKET CIP APPROVAL FOR ANY DRIVE THROUGH? WHAT WAS WHAT WAS YOUR THOUGHTS ON THAT? THAT IS WHAT'S WHAT'S BEING REQUESTED. IT WOULD APPLY TO ANY KIND OF DRIVE THROUGH, USE A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT SO THAT THAT THAT IS AN ACCURATE STATEMENT. SO THAT THAT WAS BY DESIGN. STEVEN MENTIONED IT DOES TAKE 90 DAYS. IT MAY BE MORE LIKE 60. AND IT CAN BE CONSISTENT CONCURRENT WITH THE PRELIMINARY WITH THE SITE PLAN REVIEW. SO SOMETIMES THAT

[00:50:05]

THAT WAS A THOUGHT I HAD FOR THAT BLANKET STATEMENT. THANK YOU. AND THEN THE LAST SECTION HE MENTIONED WAS 1919. 19. THANK YOU. SO IT'S THE SITE PLAN REVIEW PROCESS. AND THAT PROBABLY DOES. IT HAS THE APPROVAL CRITERIA THAT WE TALKED ABOUT AT THE AT THE FIRST FIRST READING. IT HAS SOMETHING ELSE THAT HAS TO DO WITH DUPLEXES AND SAYING THAT THOSE DON'T HAVE TO GO THROUGH A REALLY LONG SITE PLAN REVIEW PROCESS, THAT THAT WOULD BE SOMETHING ELSE WE MIGHT WANT TO TAKE UP AT ANOTHER DAY IF YOU TOOK THAT OUT, BUT THAT TO ADDRESS THE APPROVAL CRITERIA CONCERN HE RAISED, THAT WOULD BE THE APPROPRIATE SECTION. YOU STARTED TO MENTION THAT SECTION 18 WASN'T A GOOD SECTION FOR THE CUP APPROVAL. WHAT WHAT SECTIONS WOULD YOU REFER TO FOR THE CUP APPROVAL FOR? IS ONE. THAT'S THE THE USE TABLE. AND THEN FIVE IS ANOTHER THAT RELATES TO EXTRA CONDITIONS THAT APPLY JUST TO CONDITIONAL USES. THE USE TABLE IS WHERE WE ACTUALLY GO THROUGH AND SAY WHICH, WHICH USES NEED TO GO THROUGH THE CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT PROCESS. RESTAURANTS AND BANKS, PHARMACIES. AND THEN THAT OTHER SECTION THAT I MENTIONED, FIVE SPELLS OUT THE APPROVAL CRITERIA FOR A DRIVE THROUGH AND ESSENTIALLY SAYS, DON'T, DON'T STACK CARS IN A STREET. YOU NEED A TRAFFIC ENGINEER TO PREPARE A PLAN, THOSE KIND OF THINGS. ARE THERE ANY OTHER QUESTIONS FOR STAFF? BECAUSE I HAVE ONE MORE CITIZEN COMMENT CARD. ANY QUESTIONS FOR JAMIE AT THIS POINT? JAMIE YES, I DO. OKAY. REQUEST OR WHAT'S BEEN PROPOSED TO US IS TO POSSIBLY REMOVE THESE THINGS AND TALK ABOUT THEM. Y'ALL HAVE SPENT A LOT OF TIME ON THIS. THIS HAS BEEN THIS IS A LOT OF INFORMATION ON ON EVERYTHING YOU PUT TOGETHER. WHAT'S BEEN PRESENTED. DO YOU THINK THAT THERE IS A RATIONALE TO PULL OUT SOME OF THESE AND MAYBE SIT DOWN AND RELOOK AT THEM AND REVISIT THEM AND, AND BRING THEM BACK AT ANOTHER TIME? DO YOU THINK THAT WOULD BE A REASONABLE REQUEST? I AM MINDFUL, I BELIEVE THE CHARTER SAYS THEY CAN MAKE CHANGES ALL THE WAY UP TO THIRD AND FINAL READING. SO IT'S HARD. IT'S HARD TO DESIGN CHANGES ON THE FLOOR, BUT IT IS LIKE IN A WORK SESSION FORMAT, WE COULD GO IN AND SAY, STRIKE THIS PARAGRAPH, BUT KEEP THIS PARAGRAPH. THERE COULD BE UNINTENDED, UNINTENDED CONSEQUENCES TO JUST LOPPING OFF A SECTION. THAT'S ANOTHER WAY TO SAY IT. BUT THROUGH A MORE COLLABORATIVE ENVIRONMENT, WE COULD WORK WORK THROUGH THAT IF YOU'RE SO INCLINED. HE MENTIONED IT RELATING TO THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND AND DO YOU FEEL THAT THAT MIGHT BE SOMETHING THAT TO LOOK AT IT A LITTLE BIT FURTHER STUDY TO MAKE SURE IT ALIGNS WITH THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OF SOME SORT, THAT THERE'S NOT ANY KIND OF. HE BROUGHT UP SOME POINTS THAT WE HAVE, YOU KNOW, I MEAN, WE'VE GOT THE REPUTATION OF BEING HARD ON DEVELOPERS AND STUFF. AND I GET THAT. AND IF THIS IS GOING TO EXTEND, MAKE IT MORE COMPLEX OR COMPLICATED, I WOULDN'T BE FOR THAT. I WOULD I WOULD WANT TO REVISIT IT, LOOK AT IT AND MAKE SURE THAT IT ALIGNS WITH THE INTENT THAT WE WERE TRYING TO DO WITH AS FAR AS DRIVE THRUS, BECAUSE THAT HAS BEEN, AS WE'VE ALL TALKED ABOUT AN ISSUE. BUT BUT I STRUGGLE WITH JUST HAVING A BLANKET ORDINANCE THAT COMES ACROSS WITHOUT NOT HAVING SOME KIND OF FURTHER REVIEW OF SOME SORT TO MAYBE TRY TO SEE IF WE CAN NOT MAKE THINGS SO COMPLICATED, COMPLEX. DOES THAT MAKE SENSE? I CAN SPEAK BRIEFLY.

THE 2040 PLAN, I FEEL IT'S CONSISTENT WITH WITH THAT. BUT THAT'S AN OLD PLAN. THE 2050 PLAN HASN'T BEEN ADOPTED YET, AND IT COULD BE. THERE'S AN ADAGE, I LIKE TO SAY LIKE, MAKE

[00:55:08]

WE CAN. I'M WELCOME. IF ANYBODY WANTS TO ADD OR GIVE US COMMENTS ON HOW WE CAN MAKE IT BETTER, I WELCOME THAT, BUT I WOULDN'T DELAY THAT AT ALL. NATHAN. WHICH WHICH ASPECT, WHICH NUMBER ARE YOU SPEAKING OF? IT'S ON PAGE 19. PAGE 36. I THINK IT'S 1919. OKAY. CORRECT.

IT'S THE CHANGES TO P, THE BOTTOM OF THE PAGE. WHILE WE'RE LOOKING, I'M GOING TO CALL UP, IF I MAY, MR. DAVID YOUNG THIS IS STILL A SECOND READING IN PUBLIC HEARING. MR. YOUNG, IF YOU'D LIKE TO COME UP AND ADDRESS THE BOARD, I JUST HAVE A POINT OF CURIOSITY. YES. YOU HAVE TO STATE YOUR NAME AND ADDRESS AGAIN. OKAY. DAVID YOUNG 3300 SOUTH HOUSTON LEVEE.

AND THIS IS JAMIE. I'VE FORGOTTEN YOUR LAST NAME, BUT. GROSS. MR. GROSS, JUST A POINT OF CURIOSITY. WHAT RULES AND REGULATIONS DO YOU ANTICIPATE WILL BE NEEDED REGARDING FOOD

[01:00:05]

SO IT WOULD ADDRESS THAT AND MAYBE A FEW OTHER SAFETY TYPE THINGS THAT THAT WOULD BE THE GOAL OF THE ORDINANCE. THANK YOU. HOPEFULLY THAT ANSWERS YOUR QUESTION. OKAY. THANK YOU.

ANY FURTHER DISCUSSION? SO WE NEED TO FIGURE OUT A MOTION LOOKING AT THAT SITE PLAN REVIEW. THE CHANGES THAT I SEE ARE DUPLEXES WHERE ONLY ONE DUPLEX STRUCTURE IS LOCATED ON A SINGLE PLATTED LOT AND APPROVED SUBDIVISION. AND THEN WE'RE ADDING LANGUAGE REGARDING THAT. THE SITE PLAN IS CONSISTENT WITH THE OVERALL CHARACTER OF EXISTING DEVELOPMENT IN THE IMMEDIATE VICINITY OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY, AND WILL NOT MATERIALLY ADVERSELY AFFECT OTHER PROPERTY IN THE AREA OF WHICH IT IS LOCATED. AND, YOU KNOW, THAT'S VERY GENERAL AND THAT'S LIKE YOUR OPINION, I GUESS, AS TO IS IT CONSISTENT? SO THAT'S A VERY BROAD STATEMENT. AND FOR I THINK IS EASY, IT WILL ADEQUATELY, ADEQUATELY BE SERVED BY PUBLIC UTILITIES AND INFRASTRUCTURE INTENDED TO SERVE THE SUBJECT PROPERTY. SO THOSE ARE THE CHANGES THAT I SEE REGARDING THE SITE PLAN REVIEW. IS THAT CORRECT? THAT'S CORRECT. SO IF WE HAVE A WORK SESSION, DO WE CAN WE DELAY THE THIRD AND FINAL READING? TO GIVE US SOME TIME? YES, MAYOR. YOU COULD YOU COULD DEFER IT TO A LATER DATE TO ALLOW TIME FOR WORK STUDY. OKAY. IS THERE A MOTION, A WILL OF THE BOARD? I'LL MAKE A MOTION TO DEFER SO THAT SO THAT THESE THINGS CAN BE STUDIED A LITTLE BIT. SPECIFICALLY, ARE WE TALKING ABOUT 18 AND 19? WE HAVE TO DEFER THE WHOLE THING OR JUST PULL OUT CERTAIN THINGS.

THAT'S UP TO YOU. IT'S UP TO YOU. YOU CAN DO IT EITHER WAY. YOU COULD PROCEED WITH THE SECTIONS THAT YOU'RE COMFORTABLE WITH THIS EVENING AND MOVE THAT ON TO THE THIRD READING ON APRIL 27TH, AND THEN DEFER THE SECTIONS THAT YOU WOULD LIKE TO STUDY FURTHER AND TO A DATE TO BE DETERMINED. OKAY. WELL, THEN I'LL AMEND MY MOTION TO SAY THAT THE ONLY ITEMS THAT I WOULD LIKE TO DEFER WOULD BE THREE REGARDING THE TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY. AND THEN THEN I HAVE A BIT OF CONFUSION. JAMIE, YOU SAY FOUR AND FIVE IS ACTUALLY ADDRESSING THE CONCERNS OF MR. WILLIAMS AND THE OTHER CITIZENS. THEY ARE. THERE ARE OTHER THINGS IN THERE AS WELL. SO IT'S NOT CLEANLY, JUST DRIVE THROUGH. IT'S LIKE THE UTILITY SCALE SOLAR, FOR EXAMPLE, IS IN FOUR. SO IF WE WE DEFER FOUR, THEN THAT THAT GOES WITH IT TOO.

IT'S VERY INTERWOVEN. SO THERE MAY BE UNINTENDED CONSEQUENCES TO PULLING IT APART. MAYOR BOARD, JUST FOR CLARIFICATION, I DON'T SEE AS THIS TAKING US MONTHS TO SCHEDULE A WORK STUDY AND STUDY THIS FURTHER. I THINK THIS IS SOMETHING THAT WE CAN GET SCHEDULED IN THE NEXT COUPLE OF WEEKS AND PROVIDE YOU WITH THE ADDITIONAL INFORMATION THAT YOU NEED TO, TO MOVE FORWARD WITH THIS. I ALSO JUST WANT TO REITERATE WHAT MR. GROSS SAID, THAT WE DON'T CURRENTLY HAVE ANY PENDING SOLAR APPLICATIONS OUT THERE, SO DEFERRING THAT SHOULDN'T IMPACT US IN ANY WAY. OKAY, THEN I'LL ADD FOUR AND FIVE TO THAT MOTION TO THE DEFER THOSE ITEMS AND APPROVE EVERYTHING ELSE. MAYOR, MAY I ASK JUST FOR THE SAKE OF DISCUSSION? YES. IF IF WE WERE TO VOTE THIS THROUGH AS IS AND HAVE A STUDY DONE BEFORE THE NEXT MEETING, WOULD THAT UNCOMPLICATE THINGS OR WOULD THAT BE A POSSIBILITY? THAT WAS MY QUESTION AS WELL.

THE COMPLICATION IS THAT SEVERAL OF US ARE NOT HERE NEXT WEEK, AND SO TRYING TO SCHEDULE

[01:05:02]